On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:13:07PM +0200, Ronen Shitrit wrote:
> Tested, works fine.
Great. I've simplified the crypto_ctxsize calculation slightly
and this is the final version.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: ht
en Shitrit
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:37 PM
To: Ronen Shitrit
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: alignment exception on MD5 code.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:13:49PM +0200, Ronen Shitrit wrote:
> For examp
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:13:49PM +0200, Ronen Shitrit wrote:
> For example the Xscale datasheet defines:
> " Both LDRD and STRD instructions will generate an alignment exception
> when the address bits [2:0] = 0b100."
>
> LDRD and STRD are load/store double instructions, and they are used when
>
latest CSL
compiler with the new ARM EABI.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:41 PM
To: Ronen Shitrit
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: alignment exception on MD5 code.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:27:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:27:18AM +0200, Ronen Shitrit wrote:
> You are right in a 64 bit processor we should not find this issue.
> But on ARM926 (32 bit) we definitely have a problem.
Why does the ARM926 require 64-bit alignment?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: He
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: alignment exception on MD5 code.
Ronen Shitrit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The address of the first structure is aligned to 8.
> Since the first structure cipher_tfm is of size: (2 + 9(union))*4 =
> 11*4,
This calculation is correct for a 32-bit process
exception on MD5 code.
From: "Ronen Shitrit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:50:15 +0200
> On the MD5 code we allocate 2 structures in one kmalloc:
> api.c (line 129):
> tfm = kmalloc(sizeof(*tfm) + alg->cra_ctxsize, GFP_KERNEL);
Besides the things Herb
From: "Ronen Shitrit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:50:15 +0200
> On the MD5 code we allocate 2 structures in one kmalloc:
> api.c (line 129):
> tfm = kmalloc(sizeof(*tfm) + alg->cra_ctxsize, GFP_KERNEL);
Besides the things Herbert Xu has pointed out, that kmalloc()
is very much d
Ronen Shitrit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The address of the first structure is aligned to 8.
> Since the first structure cipher_tfm is of size: (2 + 9(union))*4 =
> 11*4,
This calculation is correct for a 32-bit processor. However, on a
64-bit processor you'll find that the size of crypto_tf
