Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2013-01-07 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > I'm not sure how this patchset should be dealt with (should 1st patch go > through different tree than 2nd and 3rd?), so therefore it's RFC. > > Second patch makes rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers and > third p

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2013-01-07 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:08:12AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:23:11PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Herbert Xu > > > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:42:49 +1100 > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 a

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2013-01-06 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:08:12AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:23:11PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Herbert Xu > > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:42:49 +1100 > > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > > >> I'm not sure how this patchs

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2012-12-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:23:11PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Herbert Xu > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:42:49 +1100 > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > >> I'm not sure how this patchset should be dealt with (should 1st patch go > >> through different tree

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2012-12-28 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:42:49 +1100 > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: >> I'm not sure how this patchset should be dealt with (should 1st patch go >> through different tree than 2nd and 3rd?), so therefore it's RFC. >> >> Second patch makes rfc3

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2012-12-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > I'm not sure how this patchset should be dealt with (should 1st patch go > through different tree than 2nd and 3rd?), so therefore it's RFC. > > Second patch makes rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers and > third p

[RFC PATCH 0/3] Make rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers

2012-12-28 Thread Jussi Kivilinna
I'm not sure how this patchset should be dealt with (should 1st patch go through different tree than 2nd and 3rd?), so therefore it's RFC. Second patch makes rfc3686 template work with asynchronous block ciphers and third patch changes aesni-intel to use this template. First patch fixed problem in