On 10/10/2014 09:25 AM, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 04:23 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> Sure, but I still think that we are safe here.
>> No, you're not. Dropping a single CPU changes num_online_cpus(), which
>> results in
>>
>> static uint8_t adf_get_dev_node_id(struct pci_dev *
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:47:18 -0500
Ambarus Tudor-Dan-B38632 wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:09 +0300
> Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> > + /* Galois Counter Mode */
> > + {
> > + .name = "gcm(aes)",
> > + .driver_name = "gcm-aes-caam",
> > + .blocksize = 1,
> > +
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:10:55 -0500
Ambarus Tudor-Dan-B38632 wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:10 +0300
> Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> > +static int rfc4106_setauthsize(struct crypto_aead *authenc,
> > + unsigned int authsize)
> > +{
> > + struct caam_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_c
On 10/10/2014 04:23 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> Sure, but I still think that we are safe here.
>> >
> No, you're not. Dropping a single CPU changes num_online_cpus(), which
> results in
>
> static uint8_t adf_get_dev_node_id(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> unsigned int bus_per_cpu = 0;
>
On 10/09/2014 07:12 PM, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 02:42 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
I don't think cpu hotplug matters here. This is one (probe) time
determination if the configuration is optimal or not and if it makes
sense to use this accelerator or not.
>> It absolutely
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:10 +0300
Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> +static int rfc4106_set_sh_desc(struct crypto_aead *aead)
...
> + /*
> + * Job Descriptor and Shared Descriptors
> + * must all fit into the 64-word Descriptor h/w Buffer
> + */
> + if (DESC_RFC4106_DEC_LEN + DESC_JO
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:09 +0300
Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> + /*
> + * Job Descriptor and Shared Descriptors
> + * must all fit into the 64-word Descriptor h/w Buffer
> + */
> + if (DESC_GCM_DEC_LEN + DESC_JOB_IO_LEN +
> + ctx->enckeylen <= CAAM_DESC_BYTES_MAX)
> +
