ncern. And besides,
while I am grateful for Matthias's help sponsoring these cross-compiler
packages into the archive, it's not his responsibility to maintain them,
it's ours - so if we have to step up our game to keep the packages usable in
the face of gcc uploads becaus
k Mitchell considers it a binutils bug, but we don't know how
he expects to remedy this. I think we need the Toolchain WG to pick this up.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on,
o is targeting
should require a pre-Thumb-2 U-Boot, so I'm very doubtful that the ongoing
effort to maintain such a toolchain in Ubuntu is justified (unless we find
that it becomes substantially easier with multiarch, I guess, but we're a
ways away from that yet).
Cheers,
--
Steve
by the toolchain WG, please
coordinate those with Avik Sil (Cc:ed) who is shepherding these packages for
us.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wor
making the software in Ubuntu run better on ARM? Stop on by
the #linaro channel on irc.linaro.org today!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
se team, and buildd team about what a policy for this would
need to look like - currently the policy remains the existing one, that all
build-dependencies must be satisfied by the current architecture.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
the old places? Yes, it's a hack, and maybe
> such a package would only live in a PPA.
It would certainly be a hack; the set of libraries you would be providing
compat symlinks for is arbitrary, and you can't just symlink the directories
together. I think PPA-only would, sadly, be the
