On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:24:38PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > actually, I thought ltrace was still a toolchain WG topic, but it had > been moved to developer platform: > https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/1105/TechnicalTopics#Developer%20Platform > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-linaro-n-profiling-tools
> oddly, ltrace was apparently verified to work Work was done on ltrace last cycle to *get* it working; this cycle it's on the DevPlat agenda to verify it *stays* working. :-) If there are further fixes/enhancements planned for ltrace this cycle by the toolchain WG, please coordinate those with Avik Sil (Cc:ed) who is shepherding these packages for us. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Loïc Minier wrote: > > > > > Hey > > > > > > I think we need to keep an eye on this and be ready to check ltrace if > > > this gets merged > > > > I think ltrace is broken already and needs to be fixed regardless. > > > > Motivations for the removal of PTRACE_SINGLESTEP on ARM are: > > > > 1.) Only a subset of ARMv7 instructions are supported > > 2.) Thumb-2 is unsupported > > 3.) The code is not SMP safe > > > > As we are using ARMv7, Thumb-2 and SMP in the Linaro images, this makes > > ltrace tripply broken.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
