On 1 February 2012 19:33, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote on 01.02.2012
> 16:28:04:
>
>> This patch should be queued for 4.8 .Sounds sensible to me.
>
> OK, thanks for the review!
>
>> > (As an aside, it might likewise be helpful to update the vec_set
> patterns
>> > to allow
Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So my questions are:
>
> 1. Should I compile the native gdb using android toolchain and android
> bionic/libthread libraries?
> 2. Why can’t the current gdb capture multithreads for android
> processes? This question is actually about the theory for gdb
Hi Barry,
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 10:23 +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2.Why can’t the current gdb capture multithreads for android
> processes? This question is actually about the theory for gdb to know
> multi-threads. In my opinion, both gnu and android use clone() to fork
> threads and threads i
Hi Michael,
On 2 February 2012 02:44, Michael Hope wrote:
> I've set up a new user on my laptop that we can use for experimenting
> with benchmarks during Connect. Here's what we've got:
> * A user called 'connect'
> * Ramana, Ulrich, Åsa, and myself can log in via SSH
works for me .
> * bz
I'm bringing ursa2.
-- Michael
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 2 February 2012 02:44, Michael Hope wrote:
>> I've set up a new user on my laptop that we can use for experimenting
>> with benchmarks during Connect. Here's what we've got:
>> * A
Hi Ulrich,
2012/2/3 Ulrich Weigand :
> Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So my questions are:
>>
>> 1. Should I compile the native gdb using android toolchain and android
>> bionic/libthread libraries?
>> 2. Why can’t the current gdb capture multithreads for android
>> processes? This
