On 08/12/10 05:59, Prashanth S wrote:
Dear All
Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
3 GCC cross compilers
1. Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
2. GCC 4.4.1 (Code Sourcery).
3. Linaro (gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.11-1)
I'd be interested to
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 13:31 +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> -fno-common also gives a small improvement in various benchmarks, but
> may break some programs.
Any breakage with -fno-common would be detected at link time, so if your
program compile
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010, David Gilbert wrote:
> multistrap -f armhfmultistrap.conf
FTR, I was also successful in the past in creating armhf chroots with
qemu-debootstrap.
Something like:
sudo qemu-debootstrap \
--arch=armhf sid sid-armhf http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/
should
Hi,
Those of you use silverbell may be glad to know it's back up.
Be a little careful, if you shovel large amounts of stuff over it's network
the network tends to disappear.
(Not sure if this is hardware or driver)
Dave
___
linaro-toolchain mailing lis
On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a number
of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC optimization
opportunities.
So, I'd like to get some idea of who would like to attend, and we'll try
to find a slot we can all
On 12/9/2010 6:42 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Either Wednesday 15th December at 9am UTC
> Or Thursday 16th 6pm UTC
>
> If selected these times so that Michael can attend. Obviously the former
> is more palatable to Europeans, and the latter allows Americans to join,
> if we have any inte
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:49 +
Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a
> > number of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC
> > optimization opportunities.
> >
> > So, I'd like to get so
Mostly more working with libffi; swapping some ideas back and forwards with
Marcus Shawcroft and it looks like we have
a good way forward.
Got an armhf chroot going, libffi built.
Got a testcase failing as expected.
Trying to look at other processors ABIs to understand why varargs works for
anyone
Sent from my iPad
On 9 Dec 2010, at 15:19, "Julian Brown" wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:49 +
> Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
>> On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>>> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a
>>> number of knowledgeable people together on a call
Hit send accidentally on my last mail. Sorry
On 9 Dec 2010, at 15:19, "Julian Brown" wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:49 +
> Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
>> On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>>> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a
>>> number of knowledgeable
On 9 December 2010 21:51, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2010, at 15:19, "Julian Brown" wrote:
>> * Load/store multiple instructions: GCC only generates these from
>> load_multiple/store_multiple (from a couple of places where hard
>> registers are already known, e.g. function prol
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Prashanth S wrote:
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
>> 3 GCC cross compilers
>>
>> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
>> GCC 4.4
12 matches
Mail list logo
