Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-16 Thread Michael Hope
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:07 AM, James Westby wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:54:36 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes > wrote: >> James,  are you going to check on that and make a decision, whether it is ok >> to change the mapping? > > I will get back to you. > >>  For the other issue: bugs in gcc-linaro-t

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-16 Thread James Westby
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:54:36 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: > James, are you going to check on that and make a decision, whether it is ok > to change the mapping? I will get back to you. > For the other issue: bugs in gcc-linaro-tracking showing as in progress > work items. Can we exclude the g

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-14 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 13/03/11 22:28, Michael Hope wrote: I specifically want to include gcc-linaro-tracking items. That's why I added them. Hi Andrew. What is your goal here? I'm concerned as status.linaro.org counts each tracking ticket as a work item and this inflates the amount of work recorded. I've assum

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-13 Thread Michael Hope
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 11/03/11 22:54, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, James Westby > > wrote: >> >>    On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:31:57 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes >>    mailto:mounir.bsai...@linaro.org>> wro

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-13 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 11/03/11 22:54, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, James Westby mailto:james.wes...@linaro.org>> wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:31:57 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes mailto:mounir.bsai...@linaro.org>> wrote: > Copying James to check whether there was a reason for mappi

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-11 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, James Westby wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:31:57 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes < > mounir.bsai...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Copying James to check whether there was a reason for mapping Won't fix > to > > Postponed. If there is no compelling reason, maybe it is an easy chan

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-09 Thread James Westby
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:31:57 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: > Copying James to check whether there was a reason for mapping Won't fix to > Postponed. If there is no compelling reason, maybe it is an easy change to > map it to Done instead. It is an easy change. I believe that this is done due to

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-09 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 08/03/11 19:59, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > >> >> Hi Michael, Andrew, >> >> Mounir just pointed out that our non-Ubuntu LP projects (like gcc-linaro, >> gdb-linaro etc.) are now also included in the LP work-item tracking >> statistics (http://

Re: Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-09 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 08/03/11 19:59, Ulrich Weigand wrote: Hi Michael, Andrew, Mounir just pointed out that our non-Ubuntu LP projects (like gcc-linaro, gdb-linaro etc.) are now also included in the LP work-item tracking statistics (http://status.linaro.org/linaro-toolchain-wg.html). This didn't happen in the

Work-item tracking for the "gcc-linaro-tracking" LP project

2011-03-08 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Hi Michael, Andrew, Mounir just pointed out that our non-Ubuntu LP projects (like gcc-linaro, gdb-linaro etc.) are now also included in the LP work-item tracking statistics (http://status.linaro.org/linaro-toolchain-wg.html). This didn't happen in the past due to a Launchpad issue that has now