On 11/03/11 22:54, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, James Westby <james.wes...@linaro.org <mailto:james.wes...@linaro.org>> wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:31:57 -0600, Mounir Bsaibes <mounir.bsai...@linaro.org <mailto:mounir.bsai...@linaro.org>> wrote: > Copying James to check whether there was a reason for mapping Won't fix to > Postponed. If there is no compelling reason, maybe it is an easy change to > map it to Done instead. It is an easy change. I believe that this is done due to the way that series-targeted bugs work in LP. When you target a bug to a series, say "gcc-4.4", you can remove that targeting by marking the bug "Won't Fix". That is presumably why this is there. I'm wary of changing it without understanding that interaction better though. James, are you going to check on that and make a decision, whether it is ok to change the mapping? For the other issue: bugs in gcc-linaro-tracking showing as in progress work items. Can we exclude the gcc-linaro-tracking from the status, if we decide to?
I specifically want to include gcc-linaro-tracking items. That's why I added them.
Andrew _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
