Re: Reviewing blueprints for the TSC

2010-11-10 Thread Michael Hope
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 November 2010 21:14, Michael Hope wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell >> wrote: >>> I've had a look at these and fleshed them out mostly. >>> There are some oddities: >>>  * why are maintain-beagle-models and qe

Re: Reviewing blueprints for the TSC

2010-11-10 Thread Peter Maydell
On 10 November 2010 21:14, Michael Hope wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> I've had a look at these and fleshed them out mostly. >> There are some oddities: >>  * why are maintain-beagle-models and qemu-continuous-integration >>   under "tr-toolchain-consolidate-

Re: Reviewing blueprints for the TSC

2010-11-10 Thread Michael Hope
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > I've had a look at these and fleshed them out mostly. > There are some oddities: >  * why are maintain-beagle-models and qemu-continuous-integration >   under "tr-toolchain-consolidate-qemu" and not "tr-toolchain-integration" ? I think conso

Re: Reviewing blueprints for the TSC

2010-11-10 Thread Peter Maydell
On 10 November 2010 07:27, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there.  I've been going through the blueprints in preparation for > next weeks TSC review.  The top level topics are good, and I'd like to > have the rest of the engineering blueprints checked over and updated > to match what we talked about at t

Reviewing blueprints for the TSC

2010-11-09 Thread Michael Hope
Hi there. I've been going through the blueprints in preparation for next weeks TSC review. The top level topics are good, and I'd like to have the rest of the engineering blueprints checked over and updated to match what we talked about at the summit. Ira, could you please create blueprints for