On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Prashanth S wrote:
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
>> 3 GCC cross compilers
>>
>> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
>> GCC 4.4
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 13:31 +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> -fno-common also gives a small improvement in various benchmarks, but
> may break some programs.
Any breakage with -fno-common would be detected at link time, so if your
program compile
On 08/12/10 05:59, Prashanth S wrote:
Dear All
Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
3 GCC cross compilers
1. Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
2. GCC 4.4.1 (Code Sourcery).
3. Linaro (gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.11-1)
I'd be interested to
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Prashanth S wrote:
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
>> 3 GCC cross compilers
>>
>> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
>> GCC 4.4
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Prashanth S wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
> 3 GCC cross compilers
>
> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
> GCC 4.4.1 (Code Sourcery).
> Linaro (gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.11-1)
>
> Fla
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Prashanth S wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
> 3 GCC cross compilers
>
> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
> GCC 4.4.1 (Code Sourcery).
> Linaro (gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.11-1)
>
> Fla