> Right: but you're using flang and mlir HEAD as a test suite for clang as I
> understand it, I don't think that MLIR/flang developers should get their
> patches flagged here (which is what buildbots are doing).
> We (google) are doing similar tests, but in a silent infrastructure and
> investig
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 3:39 PM David Spickett
wrote:
> > OK! But how is testing flang in stage2 helpful for this? This is just
> testing that clang from stage-1 is properly functioning right? The
> test-suite is there for this I think?
>
> Yes, it is checking that the clang in stage 1 generates
> OK! But how is testing flang in stage2 helpful for this? This is just testing
> that clang from stage-1 is properly functioning right? The test-suite is
> there for this I think?
Yes, it is checking that the clang in stage 1 generates correct SVE
code. So that when that clang becomes the next
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 1:18 PM David Spickett
wrote:
> > I didn't know this builder would test flang as well: which stage of the
> build is doing so?
>
> It tests it only for stage 2, and the 1 stage bot checks stage 1. So
> we do have some of that focus you talked about between
> clang-aarch64-
> I didn't know this builder would test flang as well: which stage of the build
> is doing so?
It tests it only for stage 2, and the 1 stage bot checks stage 1. So
we do have some of that focus you talked about between
clang-aarch64-sve-vla (which is the 1 stage) and
clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 5:46 AM Thiago Jung Bauermann <
thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Mehdi,
>
> Mehdi AMINI writes:
>
> > I don't know if you are maintaining also clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage
> > but it takes far too long right now (>10 hours).
>
> Yes, I actually increased its c
Hello Mehdi,
Mehdi AMINI writes:
> I don't know if you are maintaining also clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage
> but it takes far too long right now (>10 hours).
Yes, I actually increased its ccache size on July 6th but only from 5 GB
to 20 GB because the machine running that builder is also a devel
I don't know if you are maintaining also clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage but
it takes far too long right now (>10 hours). It notifies for large number
of people which is overly noisy right now.
See: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/198/builds/1234
One thing I noticed is that it seems to be mi
Mehdi AMINI writes:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 9:40 PM Thiago Jung Bauermann
> wrote:
>
> Mehdi AMINI writes:
>
> >> > On 29 Jun 2022, at 16:33, David Spickett
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > What build times were you expecting to see? It is useful for us to
> >> > know what expectations are
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 9:40 PM Thiago Jung Bauermann <
thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I looked into ccache usage on the LLVM build bots.
>
> Mehdi AMINI writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 3:39 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov <
> maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> We have expe
Hello,
I looked into ccache usage on the LLVM build bots.
Mehdi AMINI writes:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 3:39 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov
> wrote:
>
>> We have experimented with using zorg's CCACHE settings a few years back,
>> and it turned out to be more robust to configure ccache at the level of
>>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 3:39 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov
wrote:
> To add to David's answer, here is the logic that enables ccache in
> Linaro-maintained buildbots:
> https://git.linaro.org/ci/dockerfiles.git/tree/tcwg-base/tcwg-llvmbot/run.sh#n48
> .
>
Nice trick!
>
> We have experimented with using zorg
To add to David's answer, here is the logic that enables ccache in
Linaro-maintained buildbots:
https://git.linaro.org/ci/dockerfiles.git/tree/tcwg-base/tcwg-llvmbot/run.sh#n48
.
We have experimented with using zorg's CCACHE settings a few years back, and it
turned out to be more robust to con
While it's not visible in the zorg config we are using ccache. Except
we do it by setting the compiler to a script that runs the expected
clang/gcc via ccache. We can certainly look at using the ccache enable
in zorg instead (for the first attempt it was easier to do it in a way
we could control on
14 matches
Mail list logo
