Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-06-05 Thread Ken Werner
On 06/05/2012 01:38 AM, Michael Hope wrote: On 2 June 2012 04:14, Ken Werner wrote: Hi, OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro: * added a default xorg.conf for the qemuarmv7a MACHINE * necessary because OE-Core master switched from Xfbdev to Xorg * noticed that hard float with Linaro GCC 4.6 wor

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-06-04 Thread Michael Hope
On 2 June 2012 04:14, Ken Werner wrote: > Hi, > > OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro: >  * added a default xorg.conf for the qemuarmv7a MACHINE >   * necessary because OE-Core master switched from Xfbdev to Xorg >  * noticed that hard float with Linaro GCC 4.6 works on denzil but is broken > on master

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-05-07 Thread Michael Hope
On 7 May 2012 20:22, Ken Werner wrote: > On 05/07/2012 04:07 AM, Michael Hope wrote: >> >> On 5 May 2012 03:40, Ken Werner  wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro: >>>  * created meta-linaro denzil branch to be used in conjunction with the >>> oe >>> release >> >> >> Yocto 1.2 is

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-05-07 Thread Ken Werner
On 05/07/2012 04:07 AM, Michael Hope wrote: On 5 May 2012 03:40, Ken Werner wrote: Hi, OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro: * created meta-linaro denzil branch to be used in conjunction with the oe release Yocto 1.2 is out and this branch seem pretty quiet. Any idea when they'll tag/release?

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-05-06 Thread Michael Hope
On 5 May 2012 03:40, Ken Werner wrote: > Hi, > > OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro: >  * created meta-linaro denzil branch to be used in conjunction with the oe > release Yocto 1.2 is out and this branch seem pretty quiet. Any idea when they'll tag/release? >  * added a patch that prevents GCC from

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-04-25 Thread Ken Werner
On 04/22/2012 11:58 PM, Michael Hope wrote: On 23 April 2012 00:54, Ken Werner wrote: Hi, * catching up with emails * rebased against current OE-core * OE is planning a release in april (following the yocto schedule) * noticed the libc of our binary toolchain is lacking i18n * caus

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2012-04-22 Thread Michael Hope
On 23 April 2012 00:54, Ken Werner wrote: > Hi, > >  * catching up with emails >  * rebased against current OE-core >   * OE is planning a release in april (following the yocto schedule) >  * noticed the libc of our binary toolchain is lacking i18n >   * caused a packaging issue for meta-linaro bu

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2011-12-18 Thread Michael Hope
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Ken Werner wrote: > Hi, > > OpenEmbedded-Core: > * the CSL 2011.03 recipe works with localization support disabled >  * got the OE-Core sato image to built (~250 source packages) >  * also built the Qt4 demo image (~100 source packages) to stress the C++ > part of

Re: [ACTIVITY] weekly status

2011-11-20 Thread Michael Hope
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Ken Werner wrote: > Hi, > * Debugged a linking failure of the android perflab benchmark that Andy is > seeing. Turns out that the GCC is optimizing two consecutive calls to sinf > and cosf (same angle) are optimized by the GCC to one sincosf call. The libm > provi

Re: [ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2011-09-11 Thread Michael Hope
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > * Looked at why the backport of lp823708-4.5 retriggered the same >  bootstrap failure that Chung-Lin's patch did.  Haven't been able >  to reproduce yet. Feel free to use leo1 and leo2. A make -j2 speeds things along. -- Michael

Re: [Activity] Weekly status - w/e 19th August 2011

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Hope
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> On 22 August 2011 13:35, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: * Having some problems getting my pand

Re: [Activity] Weekly status - w/e 19th August 2011

2011-08-22 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > On 22 August 2011 13:35, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >>> * Having some problems getting my panda board working reliably. I'm >>> not sure if its the temperatu

Re: [Activity] Weekly status - w/e 19th August 2011

2011-08-22 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 22 August 2011 13:35, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> * Having some problems getting my panda board working reliably. I'm >> not sure if its the temperature or what but when it gets hot in the >> office as it was on Tuesd

Re: [Activity] Weekly status - w/e 19th August 2011

2011-08-22 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> * Having some problems getting my panda board working reliably. I'm >> not sure if its the temperature or what but when it gets hot in the >> office as it was

Re: [Activity] Weekly status - w/e 19th August 2011

2011-08-22 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > * Having some problems getting my panda board working reliably. I'm > not sure if its the temperature or what but when it gets hot in the > office as it was on Tuesday keeping it working reliably is hard. The > board locks up a

Re: [ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2011-06-20 Thread Richard Sandiford
Michael Hope writes: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> == This week == >> >> * Experimented more with A8 and A9 tuning for auto inc/dec addresses. >> >> * More work on the auto inc/dec pass itself. >> >> * Compared the assembly output in the GCC testsuite for a rang

Re: [ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2011-06-12 Thread Michael Hope
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > == This week == > > * Experimented more with A8 and A9 tuning for auto inc/dec addresses. > > * More work on the auto inc/dec pass itself. > > * Compared the assembly output in the GCC testsuite for a range >  of targets (avr, bfin, h8300

Re: [ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2010-12-12 Thread Michael Hope
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > == This week == > > * Away Monday and Tuesday. > > * Very little the rest of the week due to other IBM commitments. >  I've just finished the main part of that work, so all being well, >  it should only need a bit of nannying next week.  

Re: [ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2010-11-29 Thread Richard Sandiford
Christian Robottom Reis writes: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:57:57PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> * More ARM testing of binutils support for STT_GNU_IFUNC. >> >> * Implemented the GLIBC support for STT_GNU_IFUNC. Simple ARM testcases >> seem to run correctly. > > Coincidentally I was rea

Re: [ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2010-11-26 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:57:57PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: > * More ARM testing of binutils support for STT_GNU_IFUNC. > > * Implemented the GLIBC support for STT_GNU_IFUNC. Simple ARM testcases > seem to run correctly. Coincidentally I was reading about this exact feature at http