On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 22 August 2011 13:35, Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >>>> * Having some problems getting my panda board working reliably. I'm >>>> not sure if its the temperature or what but when it gets hot in the >>>> office as it was on Tuesday keeping it working reliably is hard. The >>>> board locks up and then crashes quite often. >>> >>> I wonder if you want to test the thermal management code coming from the >>> PMWG; Amit? >> >> If I am using the board for benchmarking I really need it to be >> running flat out all the time and not require any of the fancy PM >> features . Won't the thermal management code cause things to be >> throttled back ? > > It will.
Hmm. Coincidentally, today I filed LP: #831683. I'm looking at upgrading the toolchain build farm from a dev.omapzoom 2.6.35 kernel to linux-linaro 3.0-2011.08. CoreMark runs significantly slower on the 3.0 kernel... -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
