On 22/09/10 12:23, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> The goal is a 15% speed improvement in EEMBC relative to FSF GCC 4.5.0
> Does this mean to improve a single benchmark from EEMBC by 15%?
> Do you have an EEMBC? I have a very old version, without DENBench, which
> looks interesting according to EEMBC's site. O
Hi Julian,
Here are some thoughts about your report.
> Automatic vector size selection/mixed-size vectors
> ==
I think we (I) need to cooperate with Richard Guenther: ask him about
committing his patch to 4.6 (they are probably planning to merge v
Hi,
I need to learn much more about ARM architecture, but I have some initial
comments.
Julian Brown wrote on 15/09/2010 11:37:21 AM:
> * automatic vector size selection (it's currently selected by command
> line switch)
> Generally (check assumption) I think that wider vectors may make
On 15/09/10 10:37, Julian Brown wrote:
> The "vect256" branch now has a vectorization factor argument for
> UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD (allowing selection of different vector sizes).
> Patches to support that would need backporting to 4.5 if that looks
> useful. Could investigate the feasibility of doing
Hi,
In case this is useful in its current (unfinished!) form: here are some
notes I made whilst looking at a couple of the items listed for CS308
here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Internal/Contractors/CodeSourcery
Namely:
* automatic vector size selection (it's currently selected by command
