On 22/09/10 12:23, Ira Rosen wrote: >> The goal is a 15% speed improvement in EEMBC relative to FSF GCC 4.5.0 > Does this mean to improve a single benchmark from EEMBC by 15%? > Do you have an EEMBC? I have a very old version, without DENBench, which > looks interesting according to EEMBC's site. Other than that TeleBench and > Consumer might have vectorization potential.
I don't think this is well defined, so, I guess that means we get to twist it any way we like. ;) Seriously though, I would argue that it should be 15% on average, across all the EEMBC tests, or at least across all the tests where vectorization makes sense. The exact "15%" figure is not based on any hard facts, so we don't need to get too precise about it. Andrew _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
