with our binaries, for example.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm
afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Das Mohapatra
__
/SBAT.md
[2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206#add_comment
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user'
as mean
tions does not have this problem.
We'll have to update the ARM ELF ABI docs, yes. This is expected, and
I'm discussing it with the ABI folks.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org
<http://www.linaro.org/>
uires recompiling everything, so there's
>no difference there.
Well, over time yes. I spelled out a plan for an extended migration to
avoid a rebuild-the-world moment...
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org
<http://www.linaro.org/>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:26:56PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> >I really think the only sane thing to do is fix glibc so it can fetch
>> >the attributes from their standard locations.
>>
>> I've already proposed (and wr
case that nobody cared. Likely to be fragile, too.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
___
linaro-toolchain mailing l
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 06:39:33PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>On 2 August 2012 17:43, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> [ Also posted to debian-arm; not cross-posted to avoid subscription
>> complaints... ]
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We're currently carrying
e, as that's something I'm hoping to get feedback
about. Comments very welcome; please point out if you think there are
problems with this approach, or if there are any more implementations
of toolchain / linker that will need to be addressed.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>And here's the details as promised.
>
>I've started a wiki page at
>
>https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/HardFloat/LinkerPathCallApr2012
>
>with a strawman agenda for now, and a Doodle
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:19:38AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 04/10/2012 04:42 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>It's one of the things we're trying to achieve with multi-arch. We can
>>support mixed-ABI, mixed-OS, mixed-architecture environments cleanly
>>on one sy
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:01:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Tuesday 10 April 2012 06:42:04 Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> We understand that not everybody may want or see the need for this for
>> themselves. We *really* get that. But we want it to be possible for
>> *us* t
nt their groups and (importantly) able to make a decision here
on what we should do.
Apologies for the short notice, but we need a decision quickly.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org
<http://www
ortunate that this
argument is happening now.
We have to agree on a standard path if we're ever going to have
working cross-distro binaries, and that's increasingly important to us
in the ARM world. By all means ignore the multi-arch route that the
Debia
o wait for that as a blocker on the linker path.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-
with, however it's done.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK st...@einval.com
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
15 matches
Mail list logo
