On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:03:38PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >If directly examining the attributes section is out of the question, >perhaps the e_flags field would be a better option than OSABI, being >clearly designated as a collection of flags and also having more bits >currently unused.
That's my next fallback... >Keep in mind that changing the ELF header will require an update to the >ARM ELF specification, and is likely to cause compatibility problems >with other toolchain vendors until they make the corresponding changes. >Using existing sections does not have this problem. We'll have to update the ARM ELF ABI docs, yes. This is expected, and I'm discussing it with the ABI folks. Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
