Re: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main)

2024-08-09 Thread David Blaikie
he last green and >> yours was notified and either no one said anything, or only builds with 1 >> commit were notified and didn't say anything. >> >> The other 1 commit build is >> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/940, I will ask the >> author

Re: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main)

2024-08-06 Thread David Blaikie
sitions, but perhaps something slipped through here and because there > was no PR to associate this change with, it sent an email instead? > > Thanks, > David Spickett. > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 03:03, David Blaikie wrote: > >> -- Forwarded message - >

Fwd: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main)

2024-07-25 Thread David Blaikie
-- Forwarded message - From: David Blaikie Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Subject: Re: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main) To: Cc: This bot seems to be sending fail-mail when it's already red. My understanding was

Re: tsan buildbot failure possibly due to DWARFv5 switch

2022-01-25 Thread David Blaikie
l root out what's causing the flaky tests. > > Thanks, > David Spickett. > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 00:39, David Blaikie wrote: > > > > Seems like my change to make Clang default to DWARFv5 might've caused a > > buildbot failure on your build worker

tsan buildbot failure possibly due to DWARFv5 switch

2022-01-24 Thread David Blaikie
Seems like my change to make Clang default to DWARFv5 might've caused a buildbot failure on your build worker here: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/185/builds/1295 But I seem to be able to run this test successfully locally on my Linux machine - so I'm wondering if you can offer any help

Re: [TCWG CI] 433.milc slowed down by 4% after llvm: Add missing header

2021-12-07 Thread David Blaikie
o reduce benchmarking noise and > otherwise improve benchmarking CI. > > Regards! > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > https://www.linaro.org > > > On 7 Dec 2021, at 06:12, David Blaikie wrote: > > > > Seems... unlikely this change had a performance impact. >

Re: [TCWG CI] 433.milc slowed down by 4% after llvm: Add missing header

2021-12-06 Thread David Blaikie
Seems... unlikely this change had a performance impact. Also is this email meant to be sent to public contributors like myself, or only intended for some Linaro folks? On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 6:18 AM wrote: > After llvm commit bd4c6a476fd037fb07a1c484f75d93ee40713d3d > Author: David B

Re: [llvm-dev] Timeout tests timing out

2020-12-03 Thread David Blaikie
This'll hopefully be addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D92563 On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Diana Picus wrote: > Ping again. We're seeing this on several aarch64 bots, what can we do > about it? > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:19, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <

Re: [llvm-dev] Timeout tests timing out

2020-11-23 Thread David Blaikie
lvm.org:8011/#/builders/43, I get notifications from it > fairly often > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev > wrote: >> >> Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests? >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/s

Re: Timeout tests timing out

2020-10-22 Thread David Blaikie
Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests? http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/steps/13/logs/FAIL__lit___shtest-timeout_py On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dan Liew wrote: > > > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to remove the > > > run

Re: Timeout tests timing out

2020-09-21 Thread David Blaikie
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:31 PM Dan Liew wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:24, David Blaikie wrote: > > > > I appreciate the value of the feature - but it's possible the test > > doesn't pull its weight. Is the code that implements the feature > >

Re: Timeout tests timing out

2020-09-16 Thread David Blaikie
> still be susceptible to machine performance. > > While we are here also fix a bug in validation of > `maxIndividualTestTime` where previously it wasn't checked if the > type was an int. > > rdar://problem/40221572 > > llvm-svn: 332987 > > HT

Re: Timeout tests timing out

2020-09-16 Thread David Blaikie
Ping on this On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:27 PM David Blaikie wrote: > > The clang-cmake-armv8-lld (linaro-toolchain owners) buildbot is timing out > trying to run some timeout tests (Dan Liew author): > > Pass: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/56

Timeout tests timing out

2020-09-09 Thread David Blaikie
The clang-cmake-armv8-lld (linaro-toolchain owners) buildbot is timing out trying to run some timeout tests (Dan Liew author): Pass: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/5672 Fail: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/5673 Is there anything we c

Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-armv7-full

2020-07-08 Thread David Blaikie
Thanks! On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, 7:46 AM Adhemerval Zanella < adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi David, > > Sorry about that, I will check this out. I will probably silent the bot > while we figure out the underlying issue. > > On 07/07/2020 02:25, David Blaikie wrote

Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-armv7-full

2020-07-07 Thread David Blaikie
cmake-armv7-full/builds/11188 > > Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ > > Buildslave for this Build: linaro-tk1-08 > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: [branch master] 0c6b6e28e70c06a3cb4704d2d8f90829a689e230 > Blamelist: Amara Emerson ,Amy Kwan > ,Biplob Mish

Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-armv8-lld

2020-04-22 Thread David Blaikie
gt; Build Source Stamp: [branch master] > c2d86e1f3044abb295796c8267c7b9057f54a067 > Blamelist: Alexander Shaposhnikov ,Chris Bieneman < > chris.biene...@me.com>,Dan Liew ,David Blaikie < > dblai...@gmail.com>,Johannes Doerfert ,Mircea > Trofin ,Pavel Iliin ,Sam Kerner < > sker...@c