Hi,
We've had trouble using ABE recently.
abe$ ./abe.sh --target aarch64-linux-gnu
NOTE: Downloading md5sums to abe/snapshots
RUN: /usr/bin/wget --timeout=10 --tries=2 --directory-prefix=abe/snapshots/
http://abe.tcwglab.linaro.org/snapshots/md5sums
--2015-04-21 16:02:33-- http://abe.tcwglab.l
Hi,
I'm seeing the following build error trying to build from the current master
branch (1ac806b) of http://git.linaro.org/toolchain/binutils-gdb.
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `-L../zlib', needed by `run'. Stop.
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[3]: Leaving directory `gdb/
ix it.
That works, thanks!
Chris
> ---- Original message ----
> From: Christopher Covington
> Date: 02/26/2015 2:52 AM (GMT+07:00)
> To: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Debian Multiarch Tuple Style Naming With ABE
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently built with ABE
Hi,
I recently built with ABE for the first time. It's pretty slick.
Is there a way to make the vendor string (the "none" in
"arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-*") go away? It breaks my scripts without appearing
to add value.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Cen
Hi,
We've noticed that in the 14.11 toolchain binary release that the .asc files
contain md5sums instead of PGP signatures. Would it be possible to either
switch these files to contain signatures or change the filename to indicate
that they contain md5sums?
I also noticed that an md5sum is missi
example?
Thanks,
Chris
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Christopher Covington <mailto:c...@codeaurora.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The latest toolchain on the following page appears to be broken.
>
> http://www.linaro.org/projects/armv8/
>
>
Hi,
The latest toolchain on the following page appears to be broken.
http://www.linaro.org/projects/armv8/
Looking around one comes across the following path.
http://releases.linaro.org/latest/components/toolchain/.binaries
However the tarballs there yield: "You do not have permission to acces
Hi,
When updating:
>From git://git.linaro.org/toolchain/binutils-gdb
e0f5246..336649d master -> linaro/master
I now get the following build error:
gdb/binutils/readelf.c: In function ‘process_mips_specific’:
gdb/binutils/readelf.c:13522:3: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type
‘l
On 10/24/2014 10:20 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 23 October 2014 12:00, Will Newton wrote:
>> On 23 October 2014 10:44, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> after the recent lkml thread on blacklisting some GCC versions (see
>>> below) and the issue in identifying accurately our releases, I propos
On 07/28/2014 09:35 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 14:27, Christopher Covington wrote:
>>> - Work around the lack of perf on v8?
>>
>> Out of curiosity, what exactly is missing?
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> As far as I know, everything. But maybe thi
Hi Renato,
On 07/26/2014 05:18 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> - Work around the lack of perf on v8?
Out of curiosity, what exactly is missing?
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundat
On 04/14/2014 11:08 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> == Week of April 7th ==
>
> - Made a how-to wiki page/script on how to use QEMU and schroot for system
> emulation (TCWG-179, 2/10).
> -- This allows you to get armhf or armel or aarch64 Ubuntu or Debian system
> within minutes, e.g., for PGO or
Hi,
On 11/20/2013 03:45 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 17:57, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've noticed an issue trying to use the Linaro AArch64 binary bare metal
>> toolchain release with the MMU turned off for some low
Hi,
We've noticed an issue trying to use the Linaro AArch64 binary bare metal
toolchain release with the MMU turned off for some low-level tests.
Anytime puts, sprintf, etc. gets called, a reent structure gets created with
references to STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR FILE types. A member in the __sFile
st
Hi Wookey,
On 10/18/2013 11:49 AM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Christopher Covington [2013-10-18 10:25 -0400]:
>
> I still haven't determined to my satisfaction whether the linaro binary
> (cross) toolchains
> can be used for multiarch cross-building by just moving files
&g
On 10/17/2013 07:21 AM, Zhou Zhu wrote:
> So how does the libraries place in the rootfs? like lib/lib64 as in x86/x64?
> Is there any similar rule in arm/arm64 system (whatever
> openebedded/ubuntu/android/...) for that? Like multi arch spec in ubuntu?
OpenEmbedded unfortunately does not support m
Hi,
In building some code (CRIU) that includes linux/if_packet.h for
x86_64-linux-gnu, arm-linux-gnueabihf, and aarch64-linux-gnu, some
discrepancies popped up relating to whether the TPACKET_V3 structures were
defined. It looks like the headers shipped with the 13.08 arm-linux-gnueabihf
toolchain
On 08/19/2013 12:49 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to build a gcc-linaro that targets AArch64 (mostly
> following guides such as http://jk.ozlabs.org/docs/arm64-toolchain/) and
> failing, to be short and simple. Unfortunately I don't have the errors
> I was encountering to
Hi Rory,
On 06/21/2013 05:21 PM, rorycoll...@hushmail.com wrote:
> Still having the issue of FM/semi-hosting not catching seg-faults using
> 2013.06. With "aem-ve.specs", a fault seems to call main() repeatedly.
> With "dimon.specs", FM hangs. Any ideas how to properly compile/deal with
> faults
On 05/20/2013 01:50 PM, Padgett Don-B43265 wrote:
> I was able to track down the specs file you mentioned and get the hello
> world example to work. Thank you!
I had been meaning to mention this. Is there some way you could include the
AEM specs file in the next toolchain binaries release, either
On 04/23/2013 01:44 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 13:16, Sugumar Natarajan wrote:
>> I couldn’t find the arm-none-eabi- bare metal version of Linaro GCC 4.8.
>> Please provide the link for prebuilt baremetal tool chain binaries?
>
> arm-none-eabi- or aarch64-none-elf-? Linaro TCWG
Chen, Wookey,
Thanks for the responses.
On 02/05/2013 08:55 PM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> On 5 February 2013 22:20, Wookey wrote:
>> What is your use-case? Knowing that will help us advice on best course
>> of current action and inform us on how we might need to change what's
>> on offer.
The ini
Hi,
It seems to me that your current toolchain releases [1] don't default to a
multiarch layout. Am I looking in the right place? Do you anticipate enabling
multiarch in the future? Is doing this currently blocked by limitations in
tools such as crosstool-ng?
1. http://releases.linaro.org/13.01/c
23 matches
Mail list logo
