Chen, Wookey, Thanks for the responses.
On 02/05/2013 08:55 PM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote: > On 5 February 2013 22:20, Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> wrote: >> What is your use-case? Knowing that will help us advice on best course >> of current action and inform us on how we might need to change what's >> on offer. The initial use case would be to build a root filesystem with dynamically linked executables from the various binary interfaces and architectures happily finding their correct linker/loader, libraries, etc. A multiarch layout on the target filesystem may not be the only way to make this happen, but in my review of the options it seems like the best way. >> And finally, yes, I don't believe crosstool-ng supports multiarch >> paths much/at all yet. Fixing this would probably be useful. > > Linaro crosstool-ng had multiarch support. In the binary release, > arm-linux-gnueabihf toolchain does support multiarch. > > $ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc --print-multiarch > arm-linux-gnueabihf > > The sysroot (libc, include headers, etc) are downloaded from Ubuntu > Precise release. Please check files at > gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.7-2013.01-20130125_linux/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc/ > > The aarch64-linux-gnu toolchain does not support multiarch. This is helpful. Thanks! Thanks, Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
