Fwd: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread H.J. Lu
FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 indicates that your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic may not preserve all caller-saved registers. Please find out how the test fails. H.J. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 3:50 PM Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: FAIL: 5 regressions on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Guinevere Larsen writes: > On 13/02/2024 22:01, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> Thiago Jung Bauermann writes: >> >>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp >>> b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp >>> index 3905ad6f9362..944fbcac1b18 100644 >>> --- a/

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: FAIL: 5 regressions on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread Guinevere Larsen
On 13/02/2024 22:01, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: Hello again, Thiago Jung Bauermann writes: diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp index 3905ad6f9362..944fbcac1b18 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp +++ b/gdb/te

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85693: FAIL: 33 regressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Nathaniel, We enabled guality tests in our CI setup yesterday, and this is part of the fallout. Please ignore this report. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 09:55, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected pr

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8949-g2ca373b7e8a: FAIL: 1 regressions: 11 progressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:15:43PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp ... > > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s1281.c execution test > > The failure is due to the timeout. I'm going to investigate whether this is > a legitimate failure or your change just pushed t

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85681: FAIL: 3 regressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi H.J., We enabled guality tests in our CI setup yesterday, and this is part of the fallout. Please ignore this report. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 09:36, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problem

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85687: FAIL: 3 regressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Andrew, We enabled guality tests in our CI setup yesterday, and this is part of the fallout. Please ignore this report. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 09:39, Andrew Pinski (QUIC) > wrote: > > This does not make sense at all. The patch only t

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85664: FAIL: 29 regressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Robin, Please ignore this report. We had a bit of instability in CI testing yesterday. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 09:11, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find so

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8948-g21de3391e4c: FAIL: 33 regressions on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Jakub, Please ignore this. I'm going to investigate, but most likely this is due to instability of guality tests. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 01:43, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8949-g2ca373b7e8a: FAIL: 1 regressions: 11 progressions on arm

2024-02-14 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
> On Feb 13, 2024, at 22:03, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linar