Guinevere Larsen <blar...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 13/02/2024 22:01, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Hello again,
>>
>> Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp
>>> b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp
>>> index 3905ad6f9362..944fbcac1b18 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp
>>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp
>>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ proc test_thread_count {} {
>>> set thread_count 0
>>> gdb_test_multiple "print \$_inferior_thread_count" "getting thread
>>> count" {
>>> - -re ".* = (\[0-9]+).*" {
>>> + -re ".* = (\[0-9]+)\r\n$::gdb_prompt " {
>>> set thread_count $expect_out(1,string)
>>> gdb_assert {$thread_count == 7}
>>> }
>> It occurred to me that this gdb_test_multiple call is very similar to
>> the function get_valueof in lib/gdb.exp, so one suggestion is to use
>> that function instead. It uses "-re -wrap" so it expects the GDB prompt.
>>
> This makes a lot of sense. thanks for the help! And for making this CI, it is
> clearly
> making a difference! :D
Thank you! We're glad it is helping!
--
Thiago
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
