[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.38.9000-125-g973fe93a56: FAIL: 1 regressions

2023-09-15 Thread ci_notify
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 15 Sep

2023-09-15 Thread Peter Maydell
Progress: * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - sent patches that re-sync our defined set of usermode hwcap bits and ID register bitmasks with what the Linux kernel currently has - code review * QEMU-530 [QEMU ARM v9.4 Baseline CPU for TCG] - FEAT_HBC: wrote and sent patch for this v

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions

2023-09-15 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 9/14/23 17:04, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > On 2023-09-14 16:32, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: >> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your >> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, >> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions

2023-09-15 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi All, As Siddhesh has pointed out, 32-bit ARM has other similar nss/* tests failing with "original exit status 127". We do not have these failures for 64-bit AArch64. There seems to be a problem unrelated to Siddhesh's patch. Adhemerval, would you please investigate what's causing it? I see