Hi All, As Siddhesh has pointed out, 32-bit ARM has other similar nss/* tests failing with "original exit status 127". We do not have these failures for 64-bit AArch64.
There seems to be a problem unrelated to Siddhesh's patch. Adhemerval, would you please investigate what's causing it? I see plenty of fails in AArch32 results that do not appear in AArch64 results. See the non-flaky entries at the bottom of [1] and [2]. For background, both aarch64 and aarch32 testing is done in docker containers with very similar-looking rootfs images constructed from the same Dockerfile template [3]. Therefore, it's unlikely that we forgot to include a tool or binary in the aarch32 image. [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/lastStableBuild/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail/*view*/ [2] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/lastStableBuild/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail/*view*/ [3] https://git.linaro.org/ci/dockerfiles.git/tree/tcwg-base/Dockerfile.in -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Sep 15, 2023, at 10:16, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > On Sep 14 2023, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > >> I'm looking at the logs and all it has is: >> >> original exit status 127 >> running post-clean rsync >> >> for the new test. > > 127 is command not found in the shell. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org > GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 > "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
