[ACTIVITY] week 16

2013-04-19 Thread Renato Golin
== Progress == * Running around JM/lencode bug - caused by a codegen opt (ICMP fold) that had repercussions only on A9 and A15 code generation - spent three days trying to reduce the case when the problem fixed itself miraculously >:( * Planning for the future - Agreeing on short-term plans fo

[ACTIVITY] report week 16

2013-04-19 Thread Peter Maydell
Progress: * qemu maintenance ** sent arm-devs and target-arm pullreqs now we're in softfreeze * VIRT-4 ** received Arndale board, confirmed it works (took several hours mostly due to bonkers power switch design) ** VIRT-49 *** making progress; updated card with a list of sub-subtasks Pla

Re: http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent ISE today

2013-04-19 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:19:55 +0300 Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > All, > > > > http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent was reporting an > > Internal Server Error earlier today, and after looking at the logs > > the resultant cause was because the gcc-4.8+svn198079 Lava job > > (https://v

Re: http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent ISE today

2013-04-19 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Matt, On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:54:38 +0100 Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > All, > > http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent was reporting an > Internal Server Error earlier today, and after looking at the logs > the resultant cause was because the gcc-4.8+svn198079 Lava job > (ht

http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent ISE today

2013-04-19 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
All, http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent was reporting an Internal Server Error earlier today, and after looking at the logs the resultant cause was because the gcc-4.8+svn198079 Lava job (https://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/52224) decided that it was an a9