Hello Matt,

On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:54:38 +0100
Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org> wrote:

> All,
> 
> http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/recent was reporting an
> Internal Server Error earlier today, and after looking at the logs
> the resultant cause was because the gcc-4.8+svn198079 Lava job 
> (https://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/52224)
> decided that it was an a9 (as opposed to a9hf) job and that it didn't
> no which version of Ubuntu it was running on.
> 
> The caused the logs to be put in 
> http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-4.8+svn198079/logs/armv7l--cbuild-panda-es06-cortexa9r1/
> 
> The tcwg-web app then fell over because it couldn't pass the 
> armv7l--cbuild-panda-es06-cortexa9r1 name.
> 
> I fixed the issue by manually renaming the build log directory to:
> 
> http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-4.8+svn198079/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild-panda-es06-cortexa9r1/
> 
> And once the cron job which scans the builds had run everything now
> works.
> 
> Actions:
> 
> 1. Paul - do you mind taking a look at the build and seeing what went
> wrong 
> - my initial cursory glance makes me believe its the board having
> heat issues causing random things to happen.

Will do.
 
> 2. Paul & Matt - Looking at the code (and from something else Michael
> said to me last week) I think having hostnames with '-' characters in
> them will confuse the cbuild interface.  I propose changing cbuild to
> do a s/-/_/g on all the hostname it reads as a workaround.  I don't
> plan on changing actual hostnames of boards.  Paul is this going to
> cause a problem for you in Lava?

cbuils used to have problems with parsing hostnames with dashes, I fixed
it in at least one place. Generally, I'm not fond  of trying to
workaround bad parsing with obfuscation techniques on top of it. If
it's parsing issues, let's find and fix it.

Also, this is clearly a random issue, with low probability - should we
make any immediate motions just to do something to work it around?
There're other ways to address it, like switching to standard
pandaboards (with standard kernel), as proposed in the previous mail
("Re: Thoughts on progressing Toolchain Working Group Lava
integration") - still waiting for your reply on it.


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 



-- 
Best Regards,
Paul

Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to