Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-05-01 Thread Jon Masters
On 05/02/2012 12:15 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > On 27 April 2012 11:59, Michael Hope wrote: >> On 23 April 2012 14:23, Jon Masters wrote: >>> On 04/22/2012 06:06 PM, Michael Hope wrote: On 21 April 2012 09:10, Jon Masters wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Following up here. Where do we s

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-05-01 Thread Michael Hope
On 27 April 2012 11:59, Michael Hope wrote: > On 23 April 2012 14:23, Jon Masters wrote: >> On 04/22/2012 06:06 PM, Michael Hope wrote: >>> On 21 April 2012 09:10, Jon Masters wrote: Hey everyone, Following up here. Where do we stand? We need to have upstream patches before w

Re: Building BusyBox with 4.6.3 TC

2012-05-01 Thread Michael Hope
On 28 April 2012 02:38, Dan Donahue wrote: > Greetings, > I successfully built BusyBox using the 4.5.2 toolchain. When I try to build > BusyBox using the same config with the 4.6.3 toolchain I get the following > error: > > The Linaro 4.5.2 toolchain was installed in my Ubuntu 11.04 distro using >

Update on SPEC result noise

2012-05-01 Thread Michael Hope
I thought I'd send an update on the SPEC 2000 twolf variance. We're seeing a high amount of variance in the results for the SPEC 2000 twolf, vpr, and galgel benchmarks. I've run tests on a PandaBoard, Origen, and IGEPv2 and gotten a coefficent of variance of 0.014, 0.017, and 0.003 which suggests