Re: Spec 2000 broken?

2012-02-28 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs > wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have >> failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch. >> >> See here: >> http://ex.seab

Re: Spec 2000 broken?

2012-02-28 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have > failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch. > > See here: > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesourcery

Spec 2000 broken?

2012-02-28 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Hi Michael, I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch. See here: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesourcery~arm-64-bit-shifts-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild254-tcpanda06-cor

Re: Saturated operations

2012-02-28 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Michael Hope wrote on 28.02.2012 00:04:17: > Hi Ulrich. The saturated work you're doing at the moment - is it the > saturated add/subtract QADD/QSUB/QDADD/QDSUB or the ARMv6 > saturate-word-with-shift SSAT/USAT? Hi Michael, it's the latter (SSAT/USAT). > I've updated the old blueprint and adde