On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs <andrew.stu...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have >> failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch. >> >> See here: >> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesourcery~arm-64-bit-shifts-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild254-tcpanda06-cortexa9r1/ > > I noticed similar yesterday. SPEC 'relocate' uses the build directory > in a regex which fails when it hits the '+' and other random > characters we use in the path name. Once past that, it hits the 80 > character interpreter path limit and dies. > > I've fixed both. Please resubmit any SPEC jobs.
I've spawned spec2000 runs of gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114968~ams-codesourcery~arm-64-bit-shifts-4.7 and the ancestor gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114965. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
