On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Lv Terry-R65388
> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I changed the symbol link of /lib/ld-linux.so.2.
>>
>> sudo ln -s -f /lib32/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>>
>> But it seems the problem
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Lv Terry-R65388 wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I changed the symbol link of /lib/ld-linux.so.2.
>
> sudo ln -s -f /lib32/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>
> But it seems the problem is still not resolved.
>
> r65388@shlinux3:~/toolchain_ltib/gcc-li
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 11:53, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> Yes, the IGEPv2 and the Overo are indeed very similar machines so we
>> base the hardware modeling on the Overo.
>>
>> The only differences here are which OMAP version is used t
On 11 January 2012 11:53, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Yes, the IGEPv2 and the Overo are indeed very similar machines so we
> base the hardware modeling on the Overo.
>
> The only differences here are which OMAP version is used to initialize
> the MPU (3630 instead of 3430) and the NAND memor
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 08:43, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> Add ISEE IGEPv2 board definition (an OMAP3730 based board).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
>
Hello Peter,
> It's polite to mention that patches are against qe
On 11 January 2012 08:43, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Add ISEE IGEPv2 board definition (an OMAP3730 based board).
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
It's polite to mention that patches are against qemu-linaro if you cc
qemu-devel.
So my initial reaction to this is to ask what the
Hi Michael,
I changed the symbol link of /lib/ld-linux.so.2.
sudo ln -s -f /lib32/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-linux.so.2
But it seems the problem is still not resolved.
r65388@shlinux3:~/toolchain_ltib/gcc-linaro-4.6.3-glibc-2.13-singlelib-2011.12/arm-fsl-linux-gnueabi/bin$
l
Hi Michael,
By adding -mno-unaligned-access, kernel can start now.
I've another question, Does this option have some impact on performance?
Thanks~~
Yours
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hope [mailto:michael.h...@linaro.org]
Sent: 2012年1月11日 9:16
To: Lv
Add ISEE IGEPv2 board definition (an OMAP3730 based board).
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Makefile.target |2 +-
hw/igep.c | 123 +++
2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/igep.c
dif
On 11 January 2012 09:39, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Asa Sandahl
> wrote:
> > Hi Michael!
> >
> > Nice! I have some permission issue though. See below.
>
> Give it a go now.
>
Works now!
> What happens when you press "Record"?
>
> You'll see soon enough :)
:-)
> N
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Asa Sandahl wrote:
> Hi Michael!
>
> Nice! I have some permission issue though. See below.
Give it a go now.
> What happens when you press "Record"?
You'll see soon enough :) Note the developer will get an email when
you record the result. Don't record the res
Hi Michael!
Nice! I have some permission issue though. See below.
What happens when you press "Record"?
/Åsa
On 11 January 2012 03:07, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> Hi Åsa. Well, the first proposals have arrived. I've cc'ed this to
>> linaro-toolchain so we have a record.
>>
>> First, visit:
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
