Benchmarking / justifying cortex-strings

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Hope
Hi Dave. I've been hacking away and have checked in a couple of benchmarking and plotting scripts to lp:cortex-strings. The current results are at: http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/strings-performance/ All are done on an A9. The results are very incomplete due to how long things tak

Re: Csmith

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Hope
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Do we know anything about "Csmith"? > > Maybe we should try it? I couldn't resist having a go. It's Friday afternoon after all. I put on my end user hat, built csmith 2.0, fixed the x86 assembly code, and started it running against gcc-lina

Csmith

2011-09-01 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Do we know anything about "Csmith"? Maybe we should try it? Andrew Original Message Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] pr50193: ICE on a | (b << negative-constant) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:21:38 + (UTC) From: Joseph S. Myers To: Andrew Stubbs CC: gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, patc...@

Re: try_to_freeze() called with IRQs disabled on ARM

2011-09-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > The problem now occurs if at point [0.] the target process just > happened to be blocked in a restartable system call. For this > sequence to then work as expected, two things have to happen: > > - at point [3.], the kernel must *n

Re: try_to_freeze() called with IRQs disabled on ARM

2011-09-01 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Arnd Bergmann wrote on 08/26/2011 04:44:26 PM: > On Thursday 25 August 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > Arnd, can you test this to make sure your gdb test case still works, and > > Mark, can you test this to make sure it fixes your problem please? > > Hi Russell, > > The patch in ques

Re: Trip report: KVM Forum/LinuxCon NA 2011

2011-09-01 Thread Peter Maydell
On 1 September 2011 14:11, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:14:41PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> We spent just about all of Thursday's hacking session going through >> this.  I felt we got good agreement on the problems, and perhaps >> 80-90% agreement on Anthony Liguo

Re: request for gdb testing

2011-09-01 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Michael Hope wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Nicolas Pitre > wrote: > > > Hello Ulrich (or anyone else acquainted with gdb), > > > > > > Could the gdb test suite be run on a kernel with the below patch > applied > > > please? A confirmation

Re: Trip report: KVM Forum/LinuxCon NA 2011

2011-09-01 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:14:41PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > We spent just about all of Thursday's hacking session going through > this. I felt we got good agreement on the problems, and perhaps > 80-90% agreement on Anthony Liguori's proposed new QEMU Object Model > as a solution to them; som

Re: request for gdb testing

2011-09-01 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Michael Hope wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Hello Ulrich (or anyone else acquainted with gdb), > > > > Could the gdb test suite be run on a kernel with the below patch applied > > please? A confirmation that this patch doesn't regress gdb is required > > before

[ACTIVITY] Aug 31 - Sep 1

2011-09-01 Thread Ira Rosen
Hi, - catching up with the mail - fixed GCC PR50178 - prepared a patch to fix vectorizer dumps Ira ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain