On 1 September 2011 14:11, Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:14:41PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> We spent just about all of Thursday's hacking session going through >> this. I felt we got good agreement on the problems, and perhaps >> 80-90% agreement on Anthony Liguori's proposed new QEMU Object Model >> as a solution to them; some loose ends still need to be worked >> through. > > Thanks for sending this in. A question about the impact of a transition > here: does this require existing platforms to be ported across, or will > it live in parallel with qdev?
The aim would be to port everything across -- qemu has too many half-finished transitions already, and I think that in order to get acceptance the new device model needs to come with a transition plan. (I suspect this may involve some of the ancient and unmaintained platforms getting deleted if nobody steps up to maintain them.) -- PMM _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
