That's good work. Thanks Chung-Lin. Test cases and all!
-- Michael
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Hi, I've just pushed a merge of the current upstream patches for
> resolving the CoreMark regressions.
> (https://code.launchpad.net/~cltang/gcc-linaro/coremark-part1)
>
Hi, I've just pushed a merge of the current upstream patches for
resolving the CoreMark regressions.
(https://code.launchpad.net/~cltang/gcc-linaro/coremark-part1)
To give a quick benchmark of the current status, testing Linaro 4.5
before/after the merge of those two patches:
Optimization options
Hello,
- Tracking down bugs exposed while testing a patch for SMS to avoid
using -fauto-inc-dec flag and preparing fixes for them.
Also, prepared a fix for PR47013.
- Continue looking into DENbench and updating
https://wiki.linaro.org/Internal/ToolChain/Benchmarks.
Thanks,
Revital
_
== GCC ==
Progress:
* Spent some time digging into binutils issue for Neon but still not
sure why I see the problem when this is fixed in 2.21 branch and no one
else see this.
* Fixed PR 48090 upstream.
* Some patch review.
* T2 performance meeting.
Plans when I'm back:
* Continue lookin
On 11/04/11 11:38, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
I was going to kick off an FSF 4.5 testrun this week for a couple
of my other backports so I can run that through the test run and
submit it upstream.
Would be awesome, thanks!
I've not been able to
