That's good work. Thanks Chung-Lin. Test cases and all! -- Michael
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Chung-Lin Tang <clt...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > Hi, I've just pushed a merge of the current upstream patches for > resolving the CoreMark regressions. > (https://code.launchpad.net/~cltang/gcc-linaro/coremark-part1) > > To give a quick benchmark of the current status, testing Linaro 4.5 > before/after the merge of those two patches: > > Optimization options used were just plain '-O2 -mtune=cortex-a9', tested > on one of our Pandaboards running Maverick; all numbers are > Iterations/Sec averaged from 3 runs. > > r99492 r9942+patches improve % > -march=armv5te 2786.87 2848.12 2.20 % > -march=armv7-a 2474.50 2775.92 12.18 % > -march=armv7-a -mthumb 2297.86 2356.59 2.56 % > > I'll have to re-test to be sure, but the numbers/improvements obtained > using upstream trunk should not be too far off, at least the ARM mode ones. > > As we discussed in prior meetings, there's still one point of regression > identified that's in solving, which hopefully will finally bring the > ARMv7-A numbers above ARMv5TE. > > Chung-Lin > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-toolchain mailing list > linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
