On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Prashanth S wrote:
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
>> 3 GCC cross compilers
>>
>> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
>> GCC 4.4
Hi,
As mentioned on the standup, I just got an armhf chroot going, thanks to
markos for pointing me at using multistrap
I put the following in a armhfmultistrap.conf and did
multistrap -f armhfmultistrap.conf
Once that's done, chroot in and then do
dpkg --configure -a
it's pretty sparse i
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 December 2010 12:57, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi. As part of my work on qemu I've written a simplistic random instruction
>>> sequence generator and test harness.
>
>> I'd thoug
On 8 December 2010 12:57, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> Hi. As part of my work on qemu I've written a simplistic random instruction
>> sequence generator and test harness.
> I'd thought about this sort of thing before, but there were some
> inte
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi. As part of my work on qemu I've written a simplistic random instruction
> sequence generator and test harness. To quote the README:
>
> risu is a tool intended to assist in testing the implementation of
> models of the ARM architecture su
Hi. As part of my work on qemu I've written a simplistic random instruction
sequence generator and test harness. To quote the README:
risu is a tool intended to assist in testing the implementation of
models of the ARM architecture such as qemu and valgrind. In particular
it restricts itself to co
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Prashanth S wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> Our team in Samsung collected some performance metrics for the following
> 3 GCC cross compilers
>
> Gentoo Complier(part of Chrome OS Build Environment)
> GCC 4.4.1 (Code Sourcery).
> Linaro (gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.11-1)
>
> Fla
Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:28:27 +
> > Dave Martin wrote:
> >
> >> This allows for more active power management of such functional
> >> blocks: if the CPU is not fully loaded, you can turn them off -- th
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:28:27 +
>> > Dave Martin wrote:
>> >
>> >> This allows for more active power management of such functional
>> >> bl
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
[...]
>
> Could you do what the original FP did, and start with units off and use
> the first use of $unit in the process to turn it on? Do things like NEON
> support this?
>
Actually, this is still done -- it's the same code since NEON and
10 matches
Mail list logo
