Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Pedro, It has never worked that way. The default has been, and remains, that when you comment the CC List: "checkbox" to "Add me to CC list" is checked by default. When you revisit a bug that you are on the CC list (while logged-in) you will see a count of CC users "including you" if you are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Pedro, Pedro wrote > I have never added myself to CC on any bug I commented in the past and yet > I used to receive new comments/answers to my comments and changes to > status. I think it makes sense that it works this way (i.e. no need to > explicitly adding yourself to cc, if you comment you are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Hi Robinson, Regina Robinson Tryon wrote > I'm cc'd on that bug, and I do see email updates regarding the latest > changes made on May 25th. I don't see you in the cc list -- is it > possible that you weren't cc'd on the bug at the time? I have never added myself to CC on any bug I commented in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Hi Pedro, you need to be in the CC list, unless you are the reporter. There is a checkbox "Add me to CC". Perhaps it was not checked when you have added your comment? If you will catch up on it, you need not write a new comment, but make sure the checkbox is marked and click "Save Changes".

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Pedro wrote: > Hi all > > I provided feedback on bug > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90127 > (comment #10) > but was never notified of later comments or that the bug was fixed. > > Is this the new default or is something broken? I'm cc'd on t

[Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Hi all I provided feedback on bug https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90127 (comment #10) but was never notified of later comments or that the bug was fixed. Is this the new default or is something broken? Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundatio

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] organizing our "crasher" bugs ?

On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 15:25 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > There are ~190 bugs with the word "crash" in the summary in the states > new/assigned/reopened/unconfirmed. And another 28 with one of [ segfault segmentation sigabrt sigsegv ] in a comment.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] organizing our "crasher" bugs ?

Hi, On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:36:01PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > What would work ideally for me is to someone get the subset of all > > crashes that are ~100% reproducible under Linux and ordered by the > > numbe

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] organizing our "crasher" bugs ?

Hi, On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > What would work ideally for me is to someone get the subset of all > crashes that are ~100% reproducible under Linux and ordered by the > number of steps required to reproduce. Any ideas on how to generate that > subset ? That

[Libreoffice-qa] organizing our "crasher" bugs ?

There are ~190 bugs with the word "crash" in the summary in the states new/assigned/reopened/unconfirmed. As with the coverity, import-testing, export-testing stuff I think it would be helpful to start chewing into crashers in some systematic way where progress can be measured. 190 isn't a vast nu