On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:47 +0200, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tommy wrote:
so a ping retest mail campaign could be at the moment tested just with
the
older subsets (730d or 900d) to not generate an excessive spam.
Running the oldest set of 81 bugs wou
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tommy wrote:
> For 900 (2y 6m) --> 81 bugs
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&f1=days_elapsed&limit=0&list_id=481870&o1=greaterthan&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=900
>
> so a ping retest mail campaign could
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:47:05PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> I'm honestly hesitant to do any more of this kind of thing with the
> email notification on. Devs hate it, users hate it, etc . . . Our bug
> tracker is making progress, IMHO this can wait until we get it fully up.
> Just my two cents.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> * LibreOffice 4.4 bibisects repo creation (Bjoern)
> + Bjoern creating, but Robinson should take over
> + but has time for that? - bugzilla migration a priority... (Bjoern)
> + Bjoern can do that at the time of th
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:56:03 +0200, Florian Reisinger
wrote:
Hi,
For 180d (1/2y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id=481820&o1=greaterthan&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=180
[162 bugs]
And for 365d (1y)
https://bugs.freedes
Hi,
For 180d (1/2y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id=481820&o1=greaterthan&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=180
[162 bugs]
And for 365d (1y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id
