Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-accessibility] Adding "Accessibility" component to Bug Assistant

Hi all, in my opinion it would be great to have a component for accessibility; it could let developers to better focus on accessibility bugs and, on the other hand, blind people to know that accessibility is important for this project and that submitting bug reports of this type is more than en

[Libreoffice-qa] tester wanted: Base and MS Access 2007/2010

Hi, for bugreport [1] tester for Base with MS Access 2007/2010 wanted. Who can help? [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43187 Regards Jochen ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] C

[Libreoffice-qa] tester for Base with MS Access 2007/2010 wanted

Hi, for bugreport [1] tester for Base with MS Access 2007/2010 wanted. Who can help? [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43187 Regards Jochen ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] C

[Libreoffice-qa] tester for Base with MSAccess 2007/2010 wanted

Hi, for bugreport [1] tester for Base with MSAccess 2007/2010 wanted. Who can help? [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43187 Regards Jochen ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Ch

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.1 RC2 available

Dear Community, The Document Foundation is happy to announce the second release candidate of LibreOffice 3.6.1. The upcoming 3.6.1 will be the first in a series of frequent bugfix releases, for our feature-packed 3.6 branch. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.6.1 RC2 is not ready for production us

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

On 08/25/2012 02:30 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Joel Madero schrieb: when we actually put a bug into NEEDINFO status we put a comment that has a small blurb on our procedure. Something like "we have put this bug in NEEDINFO status because we need you to provide.we will leave the bug in this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-website] Re: New Triage Page (In Progress)

On 08/25/2012 04:46 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Joel Madero schrieb: This is only in the first phase but I'm aiming to make the triage page more complete, easy to read, and have all the information (at least linked) to effectively triage. Here is the link, feel free to comment, check it out ever

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

Hi Bjoern, Am 25.08.2012 14:21, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: However, while 10 days is usually enough, I would extend to maybe 30 days to allow for things like "reporter on vacation" etc. Counterargument: reporter receives a mail. If the bugreport is important to the reporter he will answer th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

Hi, On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > that's to long. Be sure, the info provider will answer within a week > or never. So it's common sense that a bug can be closed after 10-14 > days if there is no answer and if it can be expected that it will > not be possible t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Triage Page (In Progress)

Hi Florian, Am 25.08.2012 13:15, schrieb Florian Reisinger: Am 25.08.2012 um 10:56 schrieb Jochen : IMHO in Bugzilla exits more status-types: ASSIGNED PLEASETEST Not available right know with product= Libreoffice REOPENED VERIFIED What do you mean with "Not available"? IMHO is your statemen

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Triage Page (In Progress)

Joel Madero schrieb: This is only in the first phase but I'm aiming to make the triage page more complete, easy to read, and have all the information (at least linked) to effectively triage. Here is the link, feel free to comment, check it out every once in awhile as I'm trying to do updates some

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Triage Page (In Progress)

__ Florian Reisinger Von meinem iPad gesendet Sent via iPad Am 25.08.2012 um 10:56 schrieb Jochen : > Hi Joel, > > Am 25.08.2012 00:34, schrieb Joel Madero: >> This is only in the first phase but I'm aiming to make the triage page >> more complete, easy to read, and have all the information (at

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

Hi *, Am 25.08.2012 11:30, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: Joel Madero schrieb: we will leave the bug in this status for 6 months that's to long. + 1 I close those bugs INVALID if there was no reply. + 1 But sometimes there is additional discussion, users try to reproduce and so on and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

Joel Madero schrieb: when we actually put a bug into NEEDINFO status we put a comment that has a small blurb on our procedure. Something like "we have put this bug in NEEDINFO status because we need you to provide.we will leave the bug in this status for 6 months Hi, that's to long. Be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Triage Page (In Progress)

Hi Joel, Am 25.08.2012 00:34, schrieb Joel Madero: This is only in the first phase but I'm aiming to make the triage page more complete, easy to read, and have all the information (at least linked) to effectively triage. Here is the link, feel free to comment, check it out every once in awhile a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] "LibreOffice 3.7 most annoying bugs" necessary?

Roman Eisele schrieb: IMHO my little error indicates that, sooner or later, we need to open a new "LibreOffice 3.7 most annoying bugs" bug list ;-). Hi, this MAB proceeding is approved, and I believe we should no longer hesitate to create a a Task Bug for this. The only thing I would do dif

[Libreoffice-qa] "LibreOffice 3.7 most annoying bugs" necessary?

Hello all, today I added a bug from the current master build to our "LibreOffice 3.6 most annoying bugs" list (bug 6) -- only to realize a few minutes later that now, because 3.6 is released, the master is 3.7alpha0, and therefore bugs from the master builds should _not_ be added anymore