Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Adding RTL Keyword

2012-03-30 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Shahar Or schrieb: It would be beneficial to us, who report and follow RTL bugs, like the Ubuntu RTL team[1] to have an easy tracking of RTL bugs in LibreOffice. Hi, Thank you for your help to improve LibreOffice. Currently we use a pseudo-keyword "RTL" in the Summary line as you see here [

[Libreoffice-qa] Adding RTL Keyword

2012-03-30 Thread Shahar Or
Dear Friends, It would be beneficial to us, who report and follow RTL bugs, like the Ubuntu RTL team[1] to have an easy tracking of RTL bugs in LibreOffice. An 'rtl' keyword in the bug tracker[2] would be wonderful. An example of how we use this can be found in the Ubuntu bugs[2]. Can this be a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call

2012-03-30 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi Bjoern, 2012.03.30 15:17, Bjoern Michaelsen rašė: Hi Sophie, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote: I'm not Pedro or Rimas, but I would have time to have a look for the end of next week. If you think I'm not enough skilled, no problem. That would be excellent! And

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of the LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-23 15:00UTC

2012-03-30 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Korrawit, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:22:12PM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > >  - Setting up a ready-to-go VirtualBox with everything installed would be > >    cool (Bjoern/Korrawit?) > >    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47648 > > I'll try to do it when I have time. And th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call

2012-03-30 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Sophie, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote: > I'm not Pedro or Rimas, but I would have time to have a look for the > end of next week. If you think I'm not enough skilled, no problem. That would be excellent! And if anything, you would be overskilled as my primary c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of the LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-23 15:00UTC

2012-03-30 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello Bjoern, all, On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:34, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > attendants: Cor, Rainer, Markus, Petr, Kendy, Bjoern Sorry for my late reply and sorry that I couldn't attend the call. My exam is chasing, and I think I couldn't attend next week call too. >  - Setting up a ready-to-g

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call

2012-03-30 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Sophie, all I'm not Pedro or Rimas, but I would have time to have a look for the end > of next week. If you think I'm not enough skilled, no problem. > Excellent! You are certainly more skilled, experienced and knowledgeable about OOo/LO than I am. Thank you for jumping in! Regards, Pedro __

[Libreoffice-qa] Proposal: Calls for Testing

2012-03-30 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi developers, Hi QAers, On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:43:21AM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > My take on this: > - What does make sense, is having indeed a list of areas that can be > clearly pointed at, and to mention them in a sort of standard post > on our official TDF blog. E.g. every two weeks 4 to 8

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call

2012-03-30 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Bjoern, all, On 30/03/2012 10:41, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi Pedro, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:16:59AM -0700, Pedro wrote: Your comments make perfect sense. I am available to help with a serious comparison of Litmus vs Caseconductor. Did you already have a chance to have a look at: htt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call

2012-03-30 Thread Pedro
Hi Björn, all Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > > Did you already have a chance to have a look at: > > Would it be possible to give us a first overview of Litmus vs. > Caseconductor by > Friday next week for the next QA-call(*)? That would be great, as it would > help us > push forward the decisions on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] EasyHack tags

2012-03-30 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Rainer, On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 06:38:59PM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > I have a question / suggestion concerning EasyHack tags. I do not > know whether there has been an agreement, and the Wiki is some > wishy-washy Which Wikipages dod you find documenting this btw? Best, Bjoern ___

[Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call

2012-03-30 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Pedro, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:16:59AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > Your comments make perfect sense. I am available to help with a serious > comparison of Litmus vs Caseconductor. Did you already have a chance to have a look at: https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org/ http://readthedocs.org/doc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 21:41 +0200, Tommy wrote: > > * Pending Action Items > > + [well underway] review and re-close 3.4.x MAB fixed in 3.5.x (Rainer) > > snip > > "MAB = most annoying bugs" is a registered trademark by Tommy Lol :-) > however I'm gonna let you use it under LG