Hi Bjoern, all,
On 30/03/2012 10:41, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Pedro,

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:16:59AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
Your comments make perfect sense. I am available to help with a serious
comparison of Litmus vs Caseconductor.

Did you already have a chance to have a look at:

  https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org/
  http://readthedocs.org/docs/case-conductor/en/latest/index.html

to see if it would work for us? As said I had a testaccount, but failed to find
out how to:

  - report a test result
  - create a new test case

which are the most basic and important tasks. I might be that my account simply
didnt have the permissions to do so, but that would need clarification -- best
by working directly with the CaseConductor guys.

Would it be possible to give us a first overview of Litmus vs. Caseconductor by
Friday next week for the next QA-call(*)? That would be great, as it would help 
us
push forward the decisions on how to proceed with test case management!

Im also CC'ing Rimas, as he was looking forward to Caseconductor as a possible
replacement. @Ritmas: Would you be interested in joining Pedro in investigating
this?

I'm not Pedro or Rimas, but I would have time to have a look for the end of next week. If you think I'm not enough skilled, no problem.

Kind regards
Sophie

--
Founding member of The Document Foundation
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to