Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA related - TSC call 2012-01-26

2012-01-30 Thread Pedro
Michael Meeks-2 wrote > > Well - we employ YiFan full time for this > > > > ... so your work is much appreciated. > Thank you for that info! Now I know who to bug (pun intended) :) What me work? :) Best regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundatio

[Libreoffice-qa] guidelines for filing bugs

2012-01-30 Thread Terrence Enger
Comments 6, 7, and 8 on bug 45254 "EDITING postgreSQL-SDBC Can not edit data" show a pattern which is unhappily familiar: Q: Please tell me X. A: But X is obvious. I wonder if it would be a good idea to say, somewhere in the wiki pag

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA related - TSC call 2012-01-26

2012-01-30 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Pedro, On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 04:08 -0800, Pedro wrote: > That is because there are fewer developers using the Windows platform and > there are absurdly very few people in QA (and only a fraction on Windows). Sure, we need to do things to try to grow interest there, clearly the efforts

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA related - TSC call 2012-01-26

2012-01-30 Thread Pedro
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote > > It's really annoying that we have so many WIN build problems what > hinders to find regressions early. > That is because there are fewer developers using the Windows platform and there are absurdly very few people in QA (and only a fraction on Windows). Initially

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA related - TSC call 2012-01-26

2012-01-30 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Michael Meeks schrieb: getting the regressions query in front of more people would be good: [ a nice, short, easy to paste, minute and re-find stored query for that would be great ;-) ]. Hi, Petr added Regression query links to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA related - TSC call 2012-01-26

2012-01-30 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 19:00 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > But the positive fact is that acceptance to see regression bugs as "Most > Annoying Ones" by definition is growing. Absolutely; so - one of our issues is bad visibility & communication between QA and developers; getting the reg

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

2012-01-30 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 08:20 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > However, in a customized installation (where I removed tons of useless > dictionaries), the user interface of the first invokation is in English > and not in pt-BR. IIRC, we only install a small subset of the bundled dictionaries

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

2012-01-30 Thread Pedro
Hi Andras, all Andras Timar-3 wrote > > Well, yes, it is very unlikely that it can be "fixed" today, providing > that it requires 3 review, and I still don't understand what the > problem is. I need a good bugreport first with steps how to reproduce > the issue. > This is a .0 release anyway,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

2012-01-30 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Pedro, 2012/1/29 Pedro : > Hi Andras, all > > > Andras Timar-3 wrote >> >>     Why don't you remove en-US language files from the install set, if you >>     don't need them? IS1033=0? >> > > This might be a good workaround but it is not a solution... Do you mean it's > too late to fix this for