Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote > > It's really annoying that we have so many WIN build problems what > hinders to find regressions early. >
That is because there are fewer developers using the Windows platform and there are absurdly very few people in QA (and only a fraction on Windows). Initially I found it shocking that in a project (allegedly) used by "25 million users worldwide" only half a dozen cared to join QA. But then I realize that QA is extremely intensive (and frustrating at this rate of release). The other problem is: Developers (e.g. Michael) is paid by his company to develop for LO. Which company pays for LO's QA? I'm not pinching for a job. Just stating my frustrations with the community's lack of vision about QA (which is still by far more important, efficient and user friendly than OOo's QA ever was:) ) Hi can only praise Rainer's and Cor's work in this department! Kudos to you guys! Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-QA-related-TSC-call-2012-01-26-tp3695662p3699797.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
