Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

Hi Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06) I'm afraid "Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier" will be the critical/limiting condition. [...] You are perfectly right there! (This information was contained in the slides that I did not include in the version linked from that

[Libreoffice-qa] wiki on submitting bugs

Hi ! Since the 'how to submit bugs-wiki' is used often to redirect users to - which is great! - I thought it to be a good idea to: - promote the importance of a good report - guide people in the right direction - prevent too easy direct submitting - there are a good assistant and a step

[Libreoffice-qa] Report of translation Bugs

Hi, is it already useful to report UI and Help Translation issues found in Master 3.5 for some languages (especially German and French) or should we still wait? Kind regards Rainer Bielefeld ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status and Keyword

Hello, i hope I summarized latest results correctly on and . I recommend to use Status NEEDINFO in future. I recommend to stop using CONFIRMED Whi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test case naming

Hi Rimas, Petr and all, Thanks for the nice discussions, my ideas as follows :) On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > This is thus irrelevant, cause there's nothing to modify. :) > > > 2. I am not sure what is the meaning of the numbers 001, 002, 003. > > > >It loo