On 6/16/20 7:01 AM, Chris wrote:
Sorry not QT6, QT5.6 which is listed in the cmake as the required
version. Or is that the minimum version?
Minimum. I believe 5.15 is available on Windows. I also have only a VM
for Windows, but will fire it up again when I have time. Last time, I
also did no
rts to a plugin, and also pointing out that the
graphical reports are handled differently from textual reports. I
suppose that's not critical here, but it suggests that the graphical
reports might also eventually be output as odg (open document drawing?)
files.
Thoughts or comments?
Jack
and 5.1 released.)
5.0.0 is also rather old for libalkimia. My Gentoo system has 7.0.2 and
my Artix Linux has 8.0.2. I don't see an actual minimum libalkimia
required by 4.8.5, but it does require <6.0.0.
Jack
On 6/21/20 12:15 PM, David Houlden wrote:
On Sunday 21 June 2020 11:16:58 Jack wrote:
On 6/21/20 10:56 AM, David Houlden wrote:
Hi
I am trying to build kmymoney 4.8.5 git HEAD. It fails in make with error
"alkimia/alkonlinequote.h no such file or directory"
This looks like
On 6/21/20 12:15 PM, David Houlden wrote:
On Sunday 21 June 2020 11:16:58 Jack wrote:
On 6/21/20 10:56 AM, David Houlden wrote:
Hi
I am trying to build kmymoney 4.8.5 git HEAD. It fails in make with error
"alkimia/alkonlinequote.h no such file or directory"
This looks like
On 6/22/20 11:22 AM, David Houlden wrote:
On Sunday 21 June 2020 12:22:54 Jack wrote:
On 6/21/20 12:15 PM, David Houlden wrote:
On Sunday 21 June 2020 11:16:58 Jack wrote:
On 6/21/20 10:56 AM, David Houlden wrote:
Hi
I am trying to build kmymoney 4.8.5 git HEAD. It fails in make with error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423509
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
I'm not sure what you did "when I configured it," and I don't know if it's
relevant on debian, but have you edited /etc/locale.gen and then run
locale-gen? Is there any language choice made
hat. It should,
however, be able to print on a single check at a time - possibly
requiring you to modify or create a new check template.
Jack
On 2020.06.30 13:23, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
On Dienstag, 30. Juni 2020 18:14:22 CEST Jack wrote:
> On 2020.06.30 11:06, Bob M wrote:
I just found this program and I am trying to setup it up to print
wallet checks and I don't see any options to do that. Can someone
help me with t
I know the documentation needs
improvement on the details, and it is definitely on my list to do, but
feel free to ask here if you have any specific questions.
Jack
On 2020.06.30 13:58, Business wrote:
I can't find the plugin but I'm able to print reports can you assist
with th
nk it might compile with msvc2019, but that likely leads
to other issues, and I haven't actually tried it yet myself.
Jack
On 2020.06.17 08:02, Chris wrote:
I am happy to say moving craft to a much bigger drive and compiling
kmymoney(5.1) worked.
I then tried to compile kdevelop b
as "free speech".) In
general, check printing works fine for single checks, there is just a
packaging anomaly in (some?) Windows versions, so it doesn't seem to
know where it put the templates. Let us (the list) know if you get this
working or not. We can revisit the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423875
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423875
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Can you run from command line to see if there is any output that might help
identify the actual problem.
When you say 5.0.0 opens the file with the correct information, exactly what
information do you mean? Just that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423885
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423885
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WAITINGFORINFO
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423875
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
OK, two things to try.
First, open 5.0.8, and before you try to open any detailed view, select the
menu Tools/Consistency Check. Report what it says - either no problems, or
copy/paste the error.
If there are no errors
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423875
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
Errors about not having a price on or before the opening date of a stock is not
related to your problem. If those are the ONLY errors in the consistency
report, it doesn't help with the problem.
The icon theme pro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423994
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Templates don't create accounts, they create categories. The terminology can
easily be confusing, because internally, categories are a special type of
account. I don't believe there are any cases where ini
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423994
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Is there a reason you can't edit the security and change the ID to the proper
symbol?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Your screenshot shows Adidas in both the NAME and ID columns. I do not see
DE000A1EWWW0 anywhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
You have to edit the security, you can't change it as part of the price update
process. Open the Investments View, select an account which contains shares of
Adidas, and double click on the entry for Adidas. The
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
OK, I finally see. I'm using 5.08 on Artix Linux, and it works fine for me.
Please look in the other tab of the Investments view, just to confirm the data
for Adidas is the saem.
Is the problem the same for any
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
--- Comment #10 from Jack ---
I just tested on 5.0.8 official release for Artix Linux, and it works
correctly. Are you also using the official Kubuntu release of KMM?
Do you get the same problem with other stocks? If you can create a new kmy
file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424098
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
--- Comment #13 from Jack ---
If you can make any suggestions for improved wording in the handbook, I'll be
glad to work with it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424305
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424335
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424335
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424377
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
I have not looked at the files yet, but are you sure there isn't some
non-printing character in one of the entries?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424378
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Have you confirmed this is specific to the date part of the date picker? Have
you tried it on the year or month? Have you tried using any other date picker
in another app? (Just trying to be sure if this is specific to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424377
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
Your original payee is marked No Matching. That is why the import doesn't
match and creates a new payee. If you mark the original payee to match on
exact or partial name, the import will recognize that the payee e
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424344
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424377
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
I do not know if there is any specific reason the default for new payees is not
to match. Perhaps this bug can change to a wishlist, requesting the default
behavior be changed to match on exact name or partial name
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424378
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
I also wonder if you have check mouse click behavior in any scroll-bar, just to
be sure it's not an issue with your mouse buttons sticking. Not likely, but
easy enough to rule out.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424321
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422002
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414333
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.no...@free.fr
--- Comment #13 from Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390549
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |DUPLICATE
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424188
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
First, your example screenshot is not helpful, as I have no idea what those
account names are supposed to be. However, I believe this is because the Home
View is essentially implemented with HTML, and the angle brackets
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378937
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274021
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
*** Bug 378937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424305
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424402
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
That might depend on the keyboard. I have a US generic 105 key version (that's
from memory, so the detail may be wrong) and my keypad does have a '.' (dot).
I wonder if this is something deeper in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423999
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424507
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
You can use tags
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424511
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424544
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424507
--- Comment #6 from Jack ---
I don't think slitting accounts would work well. First the intent is to simply
designate % owenership for multiple people, not to necessarily show them
separately. For bank or investment accounts, how would you reco
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424424
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
he 5.1
branch, and should the download server get a more recent version?
Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424775
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
Richard - a lot of this is in the wording. Please consider editing the
subject. It starts by saying "I will NOT go out to a bank " which sounds
like you are refusing to do what the program requires. I now s
there any
reason not to reassign payee default categories (and scheduled
transactions) in the same way?
Jack
ed, and not just
moved up a level in the category hierarchy? If you did, and we can
repeat it, I think it counts as a bug.
On 31/07/2020 07:43, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
FYI, since you are not subscribed to the list.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Unable to delete some kmy categories
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424745
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424903
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424903
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
Also - all of that said, perhaps we should not show a Balance on the Tag view,
just for this reason.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424906
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424906
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |LATER
Status|REPORTED
On 8/2/20 10:24 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
Seems like I got past that issue (I now include make -j8 also, not sure
why I wasn't before) but have a new build error.
make -j8
[snip ]
[ 3%] Built target weboob_dialogs_autogen
[ 3%] Building CXX object
kmymoney/icons/CMakeFiles/kmm_icons.dir/km
On 8/2/20 11:41 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
How do I build 5.1 instead of master? Want to do a bit more
debugging/testing but my Ubuntu repo is still on 5.0 and from what I can
tell, there's no official PPA anywhere for kmymoney so I can hop to 5.1
easily.
Thanks!
How did you get the source for mas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425169
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
In particular, I would add that if you uncompress the file, you should grep for
A65. There "should" be a line beginning with ACCOUNT with that as the id=
value. If there is no such line present, then the acc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424682
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425364
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Are you sure that you have a pinentry program set up and working correctly. I
have a vague memory of this causing problems with encryption. (I'll add this
to my list for updating the handbook.)
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425363
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
You can use the Appimage until an equivalent version is available for your
distribution. You are correct that the appimage is a complete, standalone
version, and copying any files from it to your system is not likely to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425363
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426081
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Apologies if I'm missing something obvious, but where in the application do
these statement and page numbers appear? I don't recall them, and cannot find
any reference in the handbook.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426081
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
Thanks both for the info. The main issue is that you are talking about the
existing field, currently called "check number" (or some variant). I was just
trying to confirm that there wasn't a completely s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426851
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
All handling of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426799
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426081
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426796
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423870
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmymo...@boz.33mail.com
--- Comment #8 from Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425169
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424998
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424424
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405204
--- Comment #10 from Jack ---
Should we close as WORKSFORME, or is there a wishlist about window
size/scrollbars?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427114
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
KMyMoney simply does not handle this type of transaction. You really can't
sell something you don't have. I don't claim to know the exact details, but I
think it's actually done by buying a type of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426563
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
I don't understand what you are suggesting, but deleting data from your
financial records (even if only price data) seems against any principles or
practices of good accounting. Are you suggesting to create an import
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424998
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
See if those fields show up once you select a category in the fees or interest
dropdown.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427519
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427519
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
Apologies - I see the merge function, and it works just fine for me.
When you clicked on OK after the first error, what was still shown? Did you
still see the list of payees to merge, or did you still see the dropdown to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427519
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
Since you have done successful merges before, my guess is there is some problem
with a transaction for one of the Payees to be deleted, which interrupts the
reassignment of transactions to the chosen Payee. Again, only a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427956
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426511
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
I'm not sure why this isn't working as expected, but have you tried the last
matching option "Match on name listed below"? However, if you do that, just
put "TRANSFER CREDIT" without the &quo
Hello all,
I've seen this before, but not very often. I cannot detect any pattern
in when it happens. I think it has even been mentioned once on this
list.
Every now and then, the arithmetic in the ledger seems off by a penny
($.01). I've attached a screen shot of the Payment, Deposit,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428146
--- Comment #6 from Jack ---
Although KMyMoney is not a legal entity, the KDE e.V. is. (See
https://ev.kde.org/) I really don't know whether or not it would be
appropriate, and whether or not they would be willing to register KMM (and
othe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428164
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428164
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428164
--- Comment #13 from Jack ---
Please don't mix issues. The failure of the current 5.1 stable preview is
known (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428228) but the fix will not be
available until the next run of the build system overnight.
If yo
but it might be
worth making a modified version of getsplitpart.pl to look through ALL
transactions for such issues. I'll see if I have time to try it.
Jack
On 2020.10.26 03:55, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
Jack,
can you try the contrib/getsplitpart.pl script to extract
the info of th
On 2020.10.26 19:04, Jack wrote:
Thomas,
Thanks for the hint. That does show two transactions that clearly
didn't round well. (extracted from spreadsheet)
T010355 S0001 16137733/10016.137733
T010361 S0001 1330837/200 6654.185
Do
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428164
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428343
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Changing to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428324
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428324
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Can you provide a kmy file and csv file that exhibit the problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428484
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Will this affect a Linux build, or just the more packaged build types mentioned
in Comment #1?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424116
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427519
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
1 - 100 of 2902 matches
Mail list logo
