https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #18 from Antoine T ---
Hi, is-there chance we see a small patch in 5.1 branch? I know it is too big to
cherry-pick, but this is just about the part that is doing the setMemo.
BTW, will there be a new release from master branch in 2025, if t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #16 from Antoine T ---
(In reply to Jack from comment #15)
> I'm sorry if it wasn't clear enough, but this patch is not yet available in
> the 5.1 branch, so you will continue to see the problem in 5.1.3 and even
> the nightly build from the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #14 from Antoine T ---
Ok, I tested with
https://binary-factory.kde.org/view/AppImage/job/KMyMoney_Release_appimage-centos7/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/kmymoney-5.1-607-linux-gcc-x86_64.AppImage
. Version info shows: 5.1.3-2fecc3fb5
The is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #12 from Antoine T ---
(In reply to Jack from comment #10)
> Antoine, I'm a bit confused. Is the bug currently that when doing a QIF
> import with 5.1.2, if the Payee is changed based on matching rules, you lose
> the information in the ori
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #5 from Antoine T ---
Please note that there is an error in the test scenario I have written in
description. I said it is an OFX file while describing a QIF file. The test
scenario of the issue is actually with a QIF file, because there is n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #9 from Antoine T ---
*** Bug 463854 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
Antoine T changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #3 from Antoine T ---
I am closing this ticket as I didn't see I have opened a duplicate ticket
#351535 in 2015 (!).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
Antoine T changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #6 from Antoine T ---
Oups cannot set the status as FIXED. I closed it anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
Antoine T changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Antoine T ---
Hi, sorry
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #2 from Antoine T ---
(In reply to Jack from comment #1)
> I believe in master branch, the original field from which Payee was detected
> is included in it's entirety in the memo. I don't know if there is any
> chance that this will be back
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
Bug ID: 463854
Summary: When transaction is imported and match a configured
Payee, the date info from Payee is lost
Classification: Applications
Product: kmymoney
Version: 5.1.2
13 matches
Mail list logo