https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #2 from Antoine T <antoine.tran.31+...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jack from comment #1) > I believe in master branch, the original field from which Payee was detected > is included in it's entirety in the memo. I don't know if there is any > chance that this will be back-ported to 5.1 or not. What date does the > transaction end up having? Also - saying the date is lost implies that > there is a date field in the import which is lost. What is actually lost is > the full original content of the Payee field, Have I understood correctly? Exactly, the date lost is not the transaction date field, but the time of operation date, that is in the content of Payee field. You understood correctly. Also, the mechanism should be an option in case there is already information in MEMO field provided by the bank. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
