On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:54:16AM +, Alex Merry wrote:
> It occurred to me that KGuiAddons might not be the best place for the
> imageformat plugins, and that they should maybe become their own
> framework (either tier1 or tier4).
tier1 surely? It doesn't seem to depend on an
marked as submitted.
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
Split imageformat plugins from kguiaddons, as kimageformats
Diffs
-
superbuild/CMakeLists.txt b98f091
tier1/CMakeLists.txt 5b41494
tier1/kguiaddons/CMakeLists.txt 763883a
tier1
org/r/114141/
> ---
>
> (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 4:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kdelibs
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Split imageformat plugins from kguiaddons,
v. 26, 2013, 4:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kdelibs
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Split imageformat plugins from kguiaddons, as kimageformats
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> superbuild/CMakeLists.txt b98
ed e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114141/
> ---
>
> (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 4:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kdelibs
>
>
> Description
> -
o reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114141/
> ---
>
> (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 4:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kdelibs
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Split imageformat plugins from kguiaddons,
To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114141/
> ---
>
> (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 4:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kdelibs
>
>
> Description
> -
.
Changes
---
Oops, another commit got tangled up in the first diff.
Repository: kdelibs
Description (updated)
---
Split imageformat plugins from kguiaddons, as kimageformats
Diffs (updated)
-
superbuild/CMakeLists.txt b98f091
tier1/CMakeLists.txt 5b41494
tier1/kguiaddons
---
Split imageformat plugins from kguiaddons, as kimageformats
Fix KIO superbuild dependencies
Diffs
-
superbuild/CMakeLists.txt b98f09181de49c0c76394a9bdcc237f2e70fc221
tier1/CMakeLists.txt 5b41494837166f73d786a9d3c907b858357ca5a8
tier1/kguiaddons/CMakeLists.txt
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 02:12:25 Christoph Feck wrote:
> What remains could even be upstreamed to QtImageFormats repository?
This requires rewriting the code from scratch, though, for licensing reasons.
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE
On 26/11/13 14:36, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 15:00:08 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> Le mardi 26 novembre 2013 00:54:16 Alex Merry a écrit :
>>> What do other people think about this?
>>
>> Having the imageformat plugins in their own repositorie
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 15:00:08 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Le mardi 26 novembre 2013 00:54:16 Alex Merry a écrit :
> > What do other people think about this?
>
> Having the imageformat plugins in their own repositories make sense to me.
> I think they can go in tier1, but I am
Le mardi 26 novembre 2013 00:54:16 Alex Merry a écrit :
> It occurred to me that KGuiAddons might not be the best place for the
> imageformat plugins, and that they should maybe become their own
> framework (either tier1 or tier4).
>
> The only thing that relates the KGuiAddons
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 01:54:16 Alex Merry wrote:
> It occurred to me that KGuiAddons might not be the best place for
> the imageformat plugins, and that they should maybe become their
> own framework (either tier1 or tier4).
>
> The only thing that relates the KGuiAddons
It occurred to me that KGuiAddons might not be the best place for the
imageformat plugins, and that they should maybe become their own
framework (either tier1 or tier4).
The only thing that relates the KGuiAddons library and the imageformat
plugins is that they are both to do with QtGui. Each
15 matches
Mail list logo
