El diumenge, 5 de març de 2017, a les 23:59:02 CET, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
> I had a quick look and features seem to work as good/bad in the frameworks
> branch as in master.
>
> If noone disagrees I'll do the merge on March 13th.
I have swamped myself in stuff this week and i don't thin
Hi Ben,
It looks like that wont be needed actually. I had moved it to phabricator,
just with a non obvious name. Here's my irc log:
[Tuesday, September 1, 2015] [5:54:21 PM MDT]kdepepo: is
kaccessible needed for kmag (or anything else) in Qt5/kf5 setup ?
[Tuesday, September 1, 2015] [5:54:49
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> It looks like todo.kde.org is down or no longer a thing. I thought I moved
> the list to phabricator, but can't seem to find it on there either.
Hi Jeremy,
todo.kde.org was phased out a while back after a notified period for migrations.
Sys
It looks like todo.kde.org is down or no longer a thing. I thought I moved
the list to phabricator, but can't seem to find it on there either.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dilluns, 6 de març de 2017, a les 1:29:32 CET, Christoph Feck va
> escriure:
> > On 05.03.2
El dilluns, 6 de març de 2017, a les 1:29:32 CET, Christoph Feck va escriure:
> On 05.03.2017 23:59, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I had a quick look and features seem to work as good/bad in the frameworks
> > branch as in master.
> >
> > If noone disagrees I'll do the merge on March 13th.
>
> Jer
On 05.03.2017 23:59, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I had a quick look and features seem to work as good/bad in the frameworks
branch as in master.
If noone disagrees I'll do the merge on March 13th.
Jeremy Whiting had a list somewhere on todo.kde.org with tasks that
blocked merging. I only remembe
On lundi 6 mars 2017 01:29:32 CET Christoph Feck wrote:
> On 05.03.2017 23:59, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I had a quick look and features seem to work as good/bad in the frameworks
> > branch as in master.
> >
> > If noone disagrees I'll do the merge on March 13th.
>
> Jeremy Whiting had a list
I agree. I think the only remaining issues were "nice-to-have" features
that can be developed after it has been merged to master.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I had a quick look and features seem to work as good/bad in the frameworks
> branch as in master.
>
> If no
I had a quick look and features seem to work as good/bad in the frameworks
branch as in master.
If noone disagrees I'll do the merge on March 13th.
Cheers,
Albert
