On 07/11/2011 04:32 AM, Michael Pyne wrote:
> Either way your original question could have been posed as "Have you tried
> checking out a pre-Akonadi version of KMail" instead of "Have you tried
> checking out an older version from the pre-Akonadi& related cruft days?".
> 'Cruft' has always had ne
On 07/11/2011 09:47 AM, Tom Albers wrote:
> Can I also remind everyone at the severe 'kmail-ate-my-mails' from the KMail1
> days? There have been numerous reports that KMail ate mails in certain
> circumstance. Offline IMAP could potentially corrupt data when hitting
> check-mail at the wrong ti
On 11/07/2011, at 10:32 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Monday, 2011-07-11, Ian Wadham wrote:
>> On 11/07/2011, at 2:00 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
>>> On Monday, 2011-07-11, Ian Wadham wrote:
Surely, PIM could be designed around a shared data source (a relational
database if you must) in su
On Tuesday, 2011-07-12, Moritz Hobe wrote:
> Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 23:58:52 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> > > > Good thing then that this didn't happen.
> > > > KMail2 was introduced in a m
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 23:58:52 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> > > Good thing then that this didn't happen.
> > > KMail2 was introduced in a minor release (KDEPIM 4.6. 0), the last
> > > maintena
Am Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:58:52 +0200
schrieb Kevin Krammer :
> > Ok.
> > So it is the distries that pushed KDEPIM 4.6.0 with all the KDE
> > 4.6.X updates (forgot what X it was).
>
> Are there any distributions that have KDEPIM 4.6.0 enabled outside
> their experiemental repositories?
Arch for one,
On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > > So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most
> > > severe issues are sorted out with the new stack or use an older
On Monday, July 11, 2011 09:32:10 PM Ingo Malchow wrote:
> Please don't reply to that as of now, it looks quite strange. Needs to
> be confirmed. And to be remembered, we don't "sell" link exchanges nor
> do we accept those.
Read my other mail here, he is a known farmer and tries that with multiple
Hi all,
don't waste your time with this request for translation.
And don't ever call or link him!
He is a scammer/pisher/whatever, he mailed the gcc list, too, with two
different names (but same telephone number). And he mail me today, too.
Same trick for kate-editor.org
Greetings
Christoph
Please don't reply to that as of now, it looks quite strange. Needs to
be confirmed. And to be remembered, we don't "sell" link exchanges nor
do we accept those.
Cheerio,
Ingo
2011/7/11 Michail Bogdanov :
> Hi!
>
> I'm willing to translate page located at
> http://userbase.kde.org/KDevelop4/FAQ t
On Monday 11 Jul 2011 17:02:11 Michail Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi!
>
Hi Michail
> I'm willing to translate page located at
> http://userbase.kde.org/KDevelop4/FAQ to the Belorussian language (my
> mother tongue). What I'm asking for is your written permission, so you
> don't mind after I'll post the tr
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Michail Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm willing to translate page located at
> http://userbase.kde.org/KDevelop4/FAQ to the Belorussian language (my
> mother tongue). What I'm asking for is your written permission, so you
> don't mind after I'll post the translation
Hi!
I'm willing to translate page located at
http://userbase.kde.org/KDevelop4/FAQ to the Belorussian language (my
mother tongue). What I'm asking for is your written permission, so you
don't mind after I'll post the translation to my blog. The translation
is intended only for web, no print co
Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most
> > severe issues are sorted out with the new stack or use an older version.
> > Recommending you anything different for
On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most
> severe issues are sorted out with the new stack or use an older version.
> Recommending you anything different for a production system would imo be
> irresponsible as -- Captain
On Monday, 2011-07-11, Ian Wadham wrote:
> On 11/07/2011, at 2:00 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Ian Wadham wrote:
> >> Surely, PIM could be designed around a shared data source (a relational
> >> database if you must) in such a way that the various applications can
> >> exist
Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 08:47:47 schrieb Tom Albers:
> - Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>
> > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs:
> > > I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than
> > > KMail1.
> >
> > Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs:
> > I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than
> > KMail1.
>
> Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than
> KMail1.
> A lot of these have to do with the add
Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs:
> I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than KMail1.
Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than KMail1.
A lot of these have to do with the additional integration.
So there is a lot of promise
Am Donnerstag 23 Juni 2011, 08:40:02 schrieb Ian Wadham:
> I have recently acquired a Macbook Pro and a group called Macports
> makes available a whole range of KDE modules and apps, most of
> which can run natively on the Mac OS X desktop, thanks to Qt-mac.
> It is even possible to do KDE app deve
20 matches
Mail list logo
